cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Canon EOS R6 mark 2 raw files noisy and grainy.

Terry_R6mk2
Contributor

(fyi-I have open this new discussion as a reference point)

Seems like I am having the same issue with the grainy photos, I shoot in raw, for wildlife (birds) in flight I shoot manual, auto ISO with shutter speed above 1200 for eagles, ducks and 5000 for hummingbirds. The shots look clear and clean when taking them and even after in the camera but when downloaded to my PC, it shows as below, even after processing in lightroom, it still does not look as sharp as should be.

Using Canon EOS R6 mk2 with Sigma 150mm - 600mm contemporary glass.

Terry_R6mk2_0-1705358413970.jpeg

 

Terry_R6mk2_1-1705358413964.jpeg

 

 Not sure why the raw is so grainy, anyone having the same issue?  

"Just focus on what's important and capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, just take another shot.” – Anonymous.
15 REPLIES 15

daphnemac
Apprentice

I have the same lens and same issue 

I lowered my auto ISO in the menu and took more shots, they were much better but Canon need to fix that thing about what we see it clean and sharp in the camera review as to what comes out on the computer which has a measure of blur.   

"Just focus on what's important and capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, just take another shot.” – Anonymous.

Start a new thread and share some raw files.

TomRamsey
Rising Star

Your ISO is too high, it may be 'OK' for a subject tight in the frame on a brighter day, but the noise is too much. 

A lot of photos may look better on the camera screen than they will on the bigger computer screen.  Zoom in on your review and it may not look so good.  Many photos look good on the camera screen, that's why so many phone photos look great on the phone.

Hey Trevor-I was new to this site and feeling my way around at the time. 

"Just focus on what's important and capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, just take another shot.” – Anonymous.

No problem - it wasn't a criticism, but intended to reduce confusion - one gets people reading one thread and answering another, and all sorts of other cross-talk confusion.  I know this site takes a bit to get used to!🙂
On the subject of noise:
Inevitably, a RAW file will show more noise and less dynamic range than, say, a JPG file.  That said, with respect, I can only agree with the comments that your ISO values are too high, in order to achieve what seems to me to be an unnecessarily high shutter speed.  For the static image in particular, you could get away with a shutter speed in the area of 1/200 sec, that would give you 3 stops of light that can reduce the ISO from 25,600 to 3,200 which would make all the difference.  In my shots, I don't have the same lens as you, but the settings are relatable. 
For example, this shot was taken in extremely dim light, and despite that there is essentially no noise.  Part of this is the other settings that allow a lower ISO, and part is slightly brighter exposure setting to reduce under-exposure and thus noise from that source.  Both shots taken in available light, hand-held.  The originals were RAW and processed in Photoshop using default lens corrections, possibly cropped, and file is resized for posting here as JPG files.
Taieke: R6II, RF200-800@400mm, f/8, 1/50sec, ISO-6400Taieke: R6II, RF200-800@400mm, f/8, 1/50sec, ISO-6400 
This second image, also in very dim light also shows little noise, and that is the older original R6.
Kea: R6, RF 200-800@742mm, f/9, 1/100sec, ISO-1600Kea: R6, RF 200-800@742mm, f/9, 1/100sec, ISO-1600


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris
Announcements