01-31-2015 04:08 PM - edited 01-31-2015 04:12 PM
Hello Everyone…
I have 2 Canon Cameras EOS 40 D & EOS 7D
Currently have the following lenses
Canon EF 28-135mm IS USM (2)
Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM
Canon EF 100mm IS USM L Series Macro
Canon EFS 18-55mm (El Cheapo)
I am in the market for a wider angle fixed prime; my first choice would be…
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
However considering I do have about $1500.00 to work with I will explain the following. I am not a professional, this is one of my few hobbies, I am typically interested in landscape photography and have 100K photos behind me, my usual outing involves the 40D with the 70-300 locked and a circular polarizer, I have recently determined that I need to obtain a wider field of view, however after reading the various forums my question is should I be looking at Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM or should I be looking at a Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM for more versatility, that one seems redundant since I have a couple of 28-135s
I do already have several 58mm filters, CP, 4-ND, Color enhancher, star filters, etc
I have reached the point where since I just purchased a used 7D I would like to see better results…
Please take a look at my photography in general first then from your experience would a 50mm 1.2 be the obvious lens I am missing, I am not really interested in buying 2 new lenses, just one.
https://500px.com/Mitsubishiman
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-02-2015 07:36 PM
Thanks for the reply, I will be upgrading lenses eventually, unfortunately regarding the post processing I do virtually none at this time, after purchasing the 7D it became apperant I need to start, so saving up for photoshop, in the mean time i have paint shop pro 12, I realize it is the cheap alternative, however everyone needs to start somewhere. and I feel I am off to a good start, Thanks again.
02-03-2015 11:53 AM
Tim,
And Adobe got all kinds of negative feedback when they decided to go this route but if you look at their profit statements, it was a success. I will not do it but my company couldn't care less. It is just another line the the expense ledger.
The reason I always recommend a starter or hobbists get PSE, is Lightroom, which I love, is geared more towards a person than shoots thousands of photos. Plus beyond basics it isn't PS by a long margin.
PSE on the other hand has all the features of a data based and fairly full editing ability in one package. And it is at a very apealing price point. It is a little cousin to PS.
Bob from Boston,
"(I haven't, and I'm not exactly a newbie.)"
Robert, I have no idea of your photographic experience but personally I use LR and PS every day and I am retired! I know of no pro shop that does not use PS. 100% not 90% or 99% but 100%. PSE is almost as complete as PS regardless of all the other and/or freebie programs out there. It would be a great stepping stone to the real deal if the OP so wishes. Otherwise they can stay put with the best editor for the money.
Again my 2 cents and worth every penny.
03-04-2015 06:24 PM
03-05-2015 09:00 AM
"Are you sure you are not an undercover Nikon user?"
Hmmmm, I am a Nikon user! I have two plus several lenses. I am not undercover about it and freely admit it. It only reinforces my belief that Canon is best!
03-04-2015 07:10 PM
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.