05-15-2024 06:57 PM
I'm trying to source out the most hideous lens for my Canon rebel 2000. It's an ugly camera already, but I want something which looks worse than a 50 1.8 so that no one will ever think I know what I'm doing when holding it.
What lens would that be? Does it come in the same vomit inducing silver?
Any recommendations appreciated.
05-16-2024 03:57 AM
Not exactly ugly, but you might want to take a look at the EF 40mm f/2.8 STM and EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lenses. They are both really small, about half the length of the EF 50mm f/1.8 so it almost looks like you don't have a lens on the camera.
05-17-2024 01:08 AM
But those two lenses aren't "ugly" at all! They are nice "walking around" lenses.
05-16-2024 05:52 AM
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I do not think of any Canon EF lenses as “ugly”, not even the pancake lenses. I actually liked using a pancake lens on a Rebel body, especially when doing street photography. I could have a camera and combo that could capture quality wide angle images without looking like Joe “The Pro” Photographer, and attract unwanted attention.
I think a lens with a body color and material that does not match the camera body every well is not very attractive looking. For example, a brushed aluminum lens body used on a hard wheel, black plastic body might be very attractive looking. In fact, the combo may attract attention, for better or for worse.
The L series lenses with white bodies do not match the black bodies that they are typically paired with. But those lenses are light in color for technical reasons, not cosmetic reasons.
05-17-2024 03:13 AM
Several of these of appeared on my YouTube timeline.
https://youtu.be/uOtLZn647GE?si=g7dKL6yYNEpaZ2M9
The color of the barrel of a lens usually has nothing to do with the optical design.
05-16-2024 09:27 AM
Are you Jonny Ives in disguise?
No Canon lens comes in silver: Either black or white (Which Jonny Ives probably appreciates).
While not "ugly" - lens' shape are almost entirely dictated by technical design, not fashion - the TS lenses are funny locking with all the knobs and protuding surfaces. A bit expensive for a statement, though.
05-16-2024 12:36 PM - edited 05-16-2024 12:37 PM
“ I'm trying to source out the most hideous lens for my Canon rebel 2000. It's an ugly camera already, but I want something which looks worse than a 50 1.8 so that no one will ever think I know what I'm doing when holding it. “
The OP did not limit choices to any specific brands. Lensbaby comes to mind. BTW, one or more Canon EF-M lenses were available with silver bodies.
05-16-2024 11:08 AM
I don't quite understand the need for that but .......
".. the EF 40mm f/2.8 STM and EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lenses."
.......... are about as ugly as a lens can get. IMHO, of course.
05-17-2024 10:17 AM
This whole post and conversation is really silly.
05-17-2024 07:31 PM
Find an old scuffed up film era lens that you can mount with an adapter to the Rebel. Many of these old usable lenses with good optics have been handled enough to appear rough.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.