06-19-2024 07:11 AM - edited 06-24-2024 06:08 AM
Hi everyone, long time reader first time poster looking for some help with choosing new gear. I currently use a Nikon l340 bridge camera that I've had for like 10 years, but its on its last legs and keeps freezing on me. Basically I'm looking into replacing it with the Canon R10 and getting the Rf 100-400 IS USM lens and maybe the RF 35mm Macro lens to get me started https://vlc.onl/ .
I photograph mainly butterflies and plants/leaves but I've just got hooked on birding and my l340 goes too blurry.
My question is will the R10/100-400 combo be able to photograph birds at say 10+ meters away (I know it will work for butterflies) or would I be better off getting a superzoom bridge camera?
I don't mind getting the 1.4 RF extender if that makes a big difference.
Thanks in advance!
06-29-2024 03:33 PM
I probably should re-emphasize "to use on safari..." as the circumstance for that statement. Not to appear contradictory, but in other situations, the light weight and extreme range make this 600mm (or 800mm) lens the preferred lens. On a safari, weight really isn't a big issue but flexibility in zoom range is extremely important. When you are carrying your own equipment on your back, weight is a consideration, and, for wildlife, which is mostly "observe-from-a-distance" photography (as johnmoyer points out from his images) the wildlife is most likely not going to be coming your way - unless they are charging you for invading their space, in which case, it doesn't matter what kind of equipment you have as you're running as fast as you can away... 😉 - and will not let you get to close to them. For bald eagles, for example, getting shots of them feeding on the shore or resting up in the trees, 100m is about as close as you'll get as they have an innate sense of when you get "too close" and will take off.
To your point about the new RF200-800, this is a nice addition, depending on, as I think we've all agreed, on what situation you'll be using it in... It's a big, heavy monster, and while that might not be a factor in, say, a safari, carrying it around in a backpack all day might be. Also, on safari, I think a minimum 200mm would not work in many circumstances as that would often be "too close".
06-30-2024 10:49 AM
"... 10 years going to 6 NatGeo live presentations a year, ..."
In my job, 40 years, we had National Geographic staff photographers in the plant several times. This was back when NatGeo had a photography staff. The assignments are given to freelance photographers now. There are no “Staff” photographers at National Geographic any more.
06-30-2024 03:37 PM
And NatGeo is owned by Disney now!
I don't recall any of the NatGeo presenters ever saying they were "on staff" - they are usually "fellows" working on long-term project grants, or individual grants for short-term project assignments, or specific assignments within their field of photography. Nonetheless, all backed by Disney, er, NatGeo!
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.