cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Advice on 500mm mk1 or 600mm mk1

derrt
Apprentice

I am currently looking to purchase a big prime for a improvement in image quality and lowlight performance. Currently I shoot with the R7 and the RF200-800mm, however I am debating also upgrading my body to an R5 or R6 mk2 also due to some issues with my R7. I know that the mark one lenses are not necessarily ideal however for the price point and where I am at in my photography skills they are what I am looking for. Any advice or input to help me decide between the two lenses or the bodies. For some context I shoot wildlife(anything furry small or big) and some birds mainly owls, I am located in Wyoming so there is a large variety of shooting distances out in the sage or in the timber. I am also looking into using blinds (+ tripod) more so that way I could help offset some of the “negatives” of the old primes. I also have never owned a prime lens so I would need to get used to the inflexibility of the prime vs the zoom. I plan to keep both my R7 and 200-800 as backups, and weight is not to much of an issue I’m young and dumb with a strong back.

2 REPLIES 2

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings

Some questions for you. 

What isn't the R7 and RF200-800 not doing for you now?

What issues are you having with your R7? Does it need service? 

Do you have a budget for your potential upgrades?

The AF and light gathering performance of the R6mkII is formidable.  The R5 will offer higher resolution and the potential for more cropping of images.  

Budget and these performance options might influence a purchase decision. 

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

First there is no Mk 1, it is just the first model no Mk.

Second I would never trade a rf 200-800mm super zoom for a first version ef 500mm ro ef 600mm. I assume you are referring to the ef models? I think the rf 600mm tele is nearly $15 grand!

"For some context I shoot wildlife(anything furry small or big) and some birds mainly owls, I am located in Wyoming so there is a large variety of shooting distances out in the sage or in the timber."

There is no way I would give up 200mm to 300mm on the long when confronted with your conditions. Plus no 200mm to 400mm on the short side. Beside if you are considering the ef versions your rf 200-800mm will have better IQ, much better. Think it over before you buy.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!
Announcements