Lens accessories?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-25-2021 07:27 PM
Santa has been good. Fooled him again! Anyway, need some advice as usual from the knowledgeable shutter bugs. I have $180 to spend. Pondering getting some additional items for the Sigma 150-600mm lens; takes 95mm. UV, polarizing, neutral or what? I plan on doing a lot of wildlife photos this coming year. I went to B&H and found some listed around $40 with 5 star reviews. I know the Canon brand will be more expensive for one item and would be willing to buy the Canon even if it takes more money. Thanks.
Canon EOS T7; EF-S 18-55mm IS; EF 28-135mm IS; EF 75-300mm; Sigma 150-600mm DG
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-26-2021 08:16 AM
Either a circular polarizer (CP) or neutral density (ND) filter would probably be the most useful to you. I wouldn't both with any UV filter. If you need simple protection for the front element, I recommend using a high quality clear filter.
Personally, I use B+W filters (their XS-Pro line). No color shifts, their CP has minimal light loss, and the brass construction helps prevent binding (since most lenses wouldn't have brass filter threads).
For ND, I use 3, 6 and 10-stop (all fixed; I personally do not like variable NDs). If you plan on doing long-exposures, these are very useful. But I also use them when using off-camera flash (to avoid having to be in high-speed sync).
Ricky
Camera: EOS R5 II, RF 50mm f/1.2L, RF 135mm f/1.8L
Lighting: Profoto Lights & Modifiers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-26-2021 09:00 AM
I agree with the opinion that you do not need a UV filter, because there is already a UV filter layer built into the digital image sensor assembly. I only use a Clear filter, to keep the front element clean. I do not use one for protection from bumps and bangs.
Using lens filters is a hot button topic. Setting aside the “lens protection” argument for a moment, there is also the opinion that filters degrade the image. Yes, a cheap filter can degrade the image.
Then there are purists who do not want any filter, because the feel it degrades the image. I do not feel high quality filters significantly degrade the image, but I do feel that come can compromise the camera’s ability to focus. One the rare occasion when I might use an ND filter, I am using a tripod and I lock focus without the filter. I add the filter, and then take the shot.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-26-2021 12:35 PM
Thanks for the advice.
Canon EOS T7; EF-S 18-55mm IS; EF 28-135mm IS; EF 75-300mm; Sigma 150-600mm DG
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-26-2021 04:03 PM
"For ND, I use 3, 6 and 10-stop"
Please explain, new term to me. Thanks.
Canon EOS T7; EF-S 18-55mm IS; EF 28-135mm IS; EF 75-300mm; Sigma 150-600mm DG
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-27-2021 12:24 PM
You don't need any filter(s). Spend that money of a Black Rapid strap.
The only filter that makes any sense, or even cents, is a polarizer. And, it makes very little to boot. Learn PSE which is free to do and will do most of what that filter stuff does only better than the actual filter does.
I put protecto filters on almost every lens I own or have owned. But I do not use them on my big super tele lenses.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
