09-22-2024 12:12 PM - edited 09-23-2024 08:06 AM
Hi All! Looking for recommendations for my camera. I am not a photography buff, but am interested in learning. I primarily would like to have a good sports lens so I can take photos of my son and his team from the dugout during baseball games.
edit: looking to spend less than $500. But willing to go above if it’s necessary
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-23-2024 02:19 PM - edited 10-04-2024 12:09 AM
Thanks for that information. That is tight budget. Since Canon don't seem to sell these refurbished any longer, I would suggest going to a site like KEH.com. They rate the condition of the gear and provide a warranty.
For that budget, I would recommend one of these two:
EF-S 55-250 IS STM: $146:
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Autofocus APS-C Lens, Black {58} at KEH Camera
EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM MkII: $402:
Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II Nano USM Lens for EF-Mount, Black {67} at KEH Camera
This would be the best bet within your budget, I think. It's an excellent lens. (see my article on these 70-300 Canon Lenses In-Depth Analysis - Canon Community) and not too heavy or bulky for the camera or the confines of the dugout.
I took the following images of a match from an area on the side of field just outside the wire fence - so maybe 20m (66ft) away, and well within the focal range of the lens, with the original version of this lens - and the MkII USM version is even better:
On the second image above, the ball is actually on the end of the bat at the moment of contact. The test of a good lens is if it will take a significant crop, so the next image below is one such:
I had a look for a Sigma 150-600c lens, but the cheapest ones are $812:
Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C (Contemporary) Lens for Canon EF-Mount {95} with TS-71 Tripod Co...
09-22-2024 12:40 PM
How far will you be from the action and what is your budget to spend on a new lens. DSLR cameras have been replaced my mirrorless cameras. The AF systems in mirrorless cameras have greatly surpassed DSLRs in AF performance and low light performance. Canon has been rapidly discontinuing lenses and bodies in favor of mirrorless cameras. Most other camera manufacturers have completely dropped their DSLR lineup of cameras and lenses. Production and development have stopped for Canon. All Canon is mainly selling is exist products on shelves everything has shifted to mirrorless now.
09-23-2024 08:04 AM
Thank you for all the info! I’d say less than $500. And as far as distance, no more than the length of the field which is 206 ft. I usually stay in the dugout though.
09-23-2024 02:19 PM - edited 10-04-2024 12:09 AM
Thanks for that information. That is tight budget. Since Canon don't seem to sell these refurbished any longer, I would suggest going to a site like KEH.com. They rate the condition of the gear and provide a warranty.
For that budget, I would recommend one of these two:
EF-S 55-250 IS STM: $146:
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Autofocus APS-C Lens, Black {58} at KEH Camera
EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM MkII: $402:
Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II Nano USM Lens for EF-Mount, Black {67} at KEH Camera
This would be the best bet within your budget, I think. It's an excellent lens. (see my article on these 70-300 Canon Lenses In-Depth Analysis - Canon Community) and not too heavy or bulky for the camera or the confines of the dugout.
I took the following images of a match from an area on the side of field just outside the wire fence - so maybe 20m (66ft) away, and well within the focal range of the lens, with the original version of this lens - and the MkII USM version is even better:
On the second image above, the ball is actually on the end of the bat at the moment of contact. The test of a good lens is if it will take a significant crop, so the next image below is one such:
I had a look for a Sigma 150-600c lens, but the cheapest ones are $812:
Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C (Contemporary) Lens for Canon EF-Mount {95} with TS-71 Tripod Co...
09-23-2024 03:10 PM
Great choices Trevor I was about to suggest the 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS MK II lens. Then the Tamron or Sigma 150-600mm lenses.
09-23-2024 04:16 PM - edited 09-23-2024 06:44 PM
While I love the 150-600 range, on a crop body that is effectively providing images equivalent to 240-960mm, and that mught present challenges if one is too close to the action. As I demonstrated, one can always crop an image but it's much harder to deal with too much focal length and changing lenses is usually likely to result in the moment lost.
09-23-2024 07:04 PM
Very true that's why I always look to the EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS USM lens lineup. Unless the OP has a FF camera. But I always like to ask the sports photographers to chime in. Since I don't do sports photography. The longest FL I'll ever need is 200mm. For the most part the EF 24-70mm F/2.8L II USM lens is always mounted on my camera.
09-22-2024 01:28 PM
Hi and welcome to the forum:
First and foremost what $ budget are you prepared to invest in this lens? It's extremely hard for us to suggest optics without knowing that information - it is very easy to spend a lot more money than you are prepared to.
09-23-2024 08:05 AM
Sorry about that! I’ll edit the post with the amount. Less than $500 would be great.
09-22-2024 01:45 PM - edited 09-22-2024 01:46 PM
I take photos of baseball and cross country races with my T7. I find two lenses work for me: 75-300 and 28-135.
FWIW: A few years ago, my wife found a nice vest at Bass Pro for a couple of bucks. Good for an extra lens and battery.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.