cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

24-70 vs 24-104 2.8

msewellphoto
Contributor

So of course months after I by my RF 24-70 2.8, Canon came out with the RF 24-104 2.8. 

Which do you think is more resourceful to have. I’m wondering if it’s worth trading the 24-70 in to get the extra reach. 

Would love to pick anyone’s brain. 

11 REPLIES 11

" The ultimate rule always applies "The camera you use is the camera you carry" ..."

I would rephrase that. "The camera you carry is the camera you will use!" 

EB
EOS 1DX and many lenses.

I'll rephrase it yet again with - "The camera you CAN carry is the camera you will you"... I ran across this pic of me with my 150-600mm that is all sorts of optically amazing... but... it doesn't get used (enough) because even with a substantial bonus support strap it wears me out.  It really deserves a tripod...

I'm painfully aware and super sensitive to how important size and weight are when considering lenses for long days.

Chris

20211211_171607.jpg

EOS R6 V RF20-50mm F4 L IS USM PZ Lens Kit
Announcements