cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

24-70 vs 24-104 2.8

msewellphoto
Contributor

So of course months after I by my RF 24-70 2.8, Canon came out with the RF 24-104 2.8. 

Which do you think is more resourceful to have. I’m wondering if it’s worth trading the 24-70 in to get the extra reach. 

Would love to pick anyone’s brain. 

11 REPLIES 11

" The ultimate rule always applies "The camera you use is the camera you carry" ..."

I would rephrase that. "The camera you carry is the camera you will use!" 

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!

I'll rephrase it yet again with - "The camera you CAN carry is the camera you will you"... I ran across this pic of me with my 150-600mm that is all sorts of optically amazing... but... it doesn't get used (enough) because even with a substantial bonus support strap it wears me out.  It really deserves a tripod...

I'm painfully aware and super sensitive to how important size and weight are when considering lenses for long days.

Chris

20211211_171607.jpg

Announcements