24-105 Vs 24-70 Mk ii

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-21-2016 02:03 AM
I've been looking at the 24-70 2.8 mk ii but it's a shed load of money. Is it really that much difference to a 24-105? I mean in the real world, would you really notice any improvement of image quality?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-21-2016 04:59 AM
"I mean in the real world, would you really notice any improvement of image quality?"
Yes, I would. It is the best lens made. Period. However, that is me. It may not be that big of a deal to you. That is something you will have to decide. I have had the Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM, the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM (version one) and the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II. Believe me this is Canon's best.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-21-2016 08:23 PM
I just bought the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, after one outing I will never regret that purchase, it was recommended to me from the folks on this forum and I cannot thank them enough.
This is one of my first shots, it can only get better...
https://500px.com/photo/141271173/ds-by-paul-herold?ctx_page=1&from=user&user_id=9585591

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-22-2016 02:43 AM
Hmmm bad example tbh. That should be razor sharp with that lens/cam combination and it doesn't look sharp at all. Must be the compression of 500px
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-22-2016 09:42 AM
"... it doesn't look sharp at all ..."
Well whether it is or it isn't, you can rest assured no other lens made would have done better!
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-28-2016 04:41 PM
The reason I ask is that the Tamron is rated better than the Canon in some circles. So my options are:
1 stick with the 24-105
2 get the 24-70
3 Get the Tamron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-28-2016 05:06 PM
"The reason I ask is that the Tamron is rated better than the Canon in some circles."
I would avoid those "circles" like the plague. Those people are nuts beyond the pale.
But down to the nitty gritty.
1 stick with the 24-105
2 get the 24-70
3 Get the Tamron
The correct order is
1 ef 24-70 f2.8L II
2 Tamron 24-70mm f2.8
3 ef 24-105mm f4L IS
But in the real world and the world of Facebook all are pretty darn good. What are your goals for these lenses?
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-29-2016 09:02 PM
I'd hardly say they were nuts, they simply expressed an opinion, just like you did?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2016 09:01 AM
"... they simply expressed an opinion ..."
Perhaps so! But it doesn't make it true or a fact. The fact remains the ef 24-70mm f2.8L II is the best lens made in its class. If any lens is in second place it would be the Nikkor model.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2016 11:03 AM
LensRentals is pretty reasonable. You can rent both and check them out - you can even buy the one are renting if you are especially pleased.
