cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RF lens recommendations for projects, buildings, cafes, people, conferences

oganifrun
Apprentice

If you are a photographer and own these lenses:

RF 85mm 1.2

RF 50mm 1.8

RF 35mm 1.8

RF 16mm 2.8

and your budget allows you to buy only one lens, either a 24mm 1.8

or an RF24-105mm 4-7.1

and you specialize in photographing projects, buildings, cafes, people, and conferences, which one would you choose wisely?

4 REPLIES 4

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings,

If I owned the above primes, I'd grab the RF24-105 f4~7.1 for its versatility.

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.1.2.1), ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw MF656Cdw ~Pixel 10 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

" I'd grab the RF24-105 f4~7.1 for its versatility."

Without hesitation. WIth what you have adding a 24mil is not at all a logical choice. Plus, IMHO, I would dump the 50mil, too. A small case can be made for keeping some or all the other lenses because of the faster f-stops ability but not much. Zoom lenses are where it's at, so much easier to use.

EB
EOS 1DX and many lenses.

Agreeing with my colleagues - mostly.  I have owned all of the those lenses at one time and have kept the RF 50mm, RF 16mm  and RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM.  You haven't shared which camera that you have and what exactly you want your 24mm separate lens for (maybe you hate cropping 16mm?) and your top priorities for the lens.  If you are absolutely targeting shallow depth of field and bokeh at 24mm as your highest priority you will lose some of that that with the 24-105. That would be the biggest "con" for that lens.  If you're shooting indoors without IBIS on your camera you'll have to live with higher ISOs at longer focal lengths even with IS.  So, in general I agree with my colleagues but I will point out that I, at least, don't have all of the information to say that 100% of the time in all situations I would recommend the 24-105mm over the 24mm.  That said, I love mine and think it's an incredible bargain on any camera with IBIS and getting up to 5 stops of IS isn't anything to sneeze at either.

One warning, you may find the zoom addictive and decide you enjoy not swapping primes and zooming with your feet.    Or perhaps not - everyone is different.


>> Owns/Owned both Canon EOS mirrorless full-frame and APS-C cameras and associated RF, RF-S and EF adapted lenses - inventory tends to change on short notice. Same for flashes, tripods, bags, straps, etc.
Plus>> Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1100 Printer. My photos are edited using Canon Photo Professional and no Adobe products.
>>The opinions and assistance are my own. Please don't blame Canon for any mistakes on my part.

TomRamsey
Mentor
Mentor

The zoom would give you versatility that you dot really have.  But, it is also not nearly as fast as your other lenses, which could show up on indoor shots unless you are using a tripod.  But, noise reduction in software is pretty good these days.

If I'm shooting something like a building, I'm going to use different focal lengths and I really don't want to be changing lenses all that much, I really prefer not to change lenses outside if I don't have to.  I would choose the zoom.

EOS R6 V RF20-50mm F4 L IS USM PZ Lens Kit
Announcements