EOS R6 Mark III or EOS R5 Mark II: Best for aviation and wildlife?

[guharlaga]

I’ve been doing my research about what my next camera should be. I’m stuck between the r6 mark iii and R5 mark ii. let’s say price is t an issue and I’m mainly shooing aviation and wildlife, which one is the winner?

[shadowsports]

Greetings,

The R5 mkII is a premium, high resolution, stacked sensor, top tier offering that includes active cooling and a digic accelerator.  It's focus is professional photography, but it also takes beautiful 8k video.  It's sensor readout speed is 6.5 ms.

The R6 mkIII is a mid tier, hybrid option that includes a optimized working resolution, strong video features and 7k video that includes open gate..  It's electronic shutter has slightly higher FPS.  It's sensor readout speed is 13.5 ms which makes it a little more prone to rolling shutter.  It's a true middle of the road hybrid offering.  

Based on your research, which camera wins for you?

[ebiggs1]

As indicated above the two are really not comparable. They are designed for two different markets and consumers.

" I’m mainly shooing aviation and wildlife,..."

For what this limited statement says, any current digital camera will do just fine.

[ebiggs1]

" I’m mainly shooing aviation and wildlife,..."

The lens is more a factor than the camera. I would prefer a bottom line camera and a great lens over a top of the line camera and a poor lens.