cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

noise check at high iso for 600 d

shumonsaha
Enthusiast

what is the maximum iso that 600d supports without too much noise?

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Absolutely... in fact lower ISO is better.

 

Keep in mind that if your subject isn't moving AND if your camera body isn't moving, then you can keep the shutter open as long as you want.    You really only need to increase ISO for moving subjects or for hand-held shooting.

 

Higher f-stops (f/11... f/16... or even f/22) will increase the "depth of field" so that your images has more content in focus ... front to back when shooting landscapes.  There is an issue known as "diffraction" that can slightly soften an image shot at a very high f-stop IF you really enlarge your images and inspect them closely... but mostly you wont notice this in the image sizes commonly used to display on a computer or anything you don't plan to put in a large frame and hang on a wall.

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

shumonsaha
Enthusiast

I want to use the info to set max iso in auto iso mode.pls suggest from your experience.thanks

 

TCampbell
Elite
Elite

This completely depends on whether you shoot RAW vs. JPEG (noise reduction is automatically applied to JPEG images) and also what size you plan to use when viewing the images.

 

In a typical "web" size image, you often can't notice noise even if the noise is fairly strong.  But at a "100% crop" (meaning it's enlarged enough so that you can see every pixel) you might notice fairly strong noise levels.

 

Here's a sample -- not shot with a 600D, this was shot with a 5D II, but it illustrates the point.

 

This image was taken at ISO 6400:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/thevirtualtim/6304378772/in/set-72157628031936034/

 

As you view it, there's not much noticable noise -- the noise is there but it doesn't seem like much because of the size you're using when viewing this.  

 

However... view the next image:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/thevirtualtim/6304378966/in/set-72157628031936034/

 

This is not a different exposure... it's the same picture.  I've just cropped in from the original so that you can only see his face, but this image is a 100% crop so you can see every pixel and from here you can notice the noise is actually fairly strong.

 

Note that these images were shot in RAW and I delibereately did not use any noise-reduction processing on these.  Keep in mind that noise-reduction software also has the tendency to "soften" an image.

 

My guess is you will be quite pleased with any ISO of 800 or lower.  At 1600 and 3200 you'll likely see some noise but it will likely be moderate and acceptable (and also fairly easily handled using noise-reduction software).  At 6400 you will probably not like the amount of noise UNLESS you're just going to use small image sizes.

 

But keep this in mind... to keep noise low, you can keep the ISO sensitivety low and use a longer exposure time.  But if the exposure time is too long for a hand-held shot then you'll get blur caused by camera motion during the exposure.  While you can "de-noise" an image using software, you can't do much about a blurry shot because the camera was moving during the exposure.  I'd rather have a sharp image with noise than a low-noise image that's blurry.   There's a reason you can crank up that ISO and sometimes cranking it up is the right thing to do.

 

Lastly, keep in mind that a GREAT way to keep the ISO down and thus keep the noise down is to use a lens with a lower focal ratio so that it collects more light.  If you were using an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens to take a shot at or near the 55mm end then the lens' widest aperture is f/5.6.  If you were to use a 50mm f/1.4 lens, you'd have a lens that can collect SIXTEEN TIMES more light (f/1.4 is FOUR full stops more than f/5.6) -- but keep in mind that the depth of field gets much narrower so you may not want to go below f/2.0 depending on what you're shooting (although f/2 is still eight times more light than f/5.6). This is why they refer to lenses with low focal ratios as "fast" lenses - they can collect a lot of light in a short amount of time.

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da

thank you for the long and detailed reply.

For landscape at f9 and above, 

can I safely work with iso 800 or lower?

 

Absolutely... in fact lower ISO is better.

 

Keep in mind that if your subject isn't moving AND if your camera body isn't moving, then you can keep the shutter open as long as you want.    You really only need to increase ISO for moving subjects or for hand-held shooting.

 

Higher f-stops (f/11... f/16... or even f/22) will increase the "depth of field" so that your images has more content in focus ... front to back when shooting landscapes.  There is an issue known as "diffraction" that can slightly soften an image shot at a very high f-stop IF you really enlarge your images and inspect them closely... but mostly you wont notice this in the image sizes commonly used to display on a computer or anything you don't plan to put in a large frame and hang on a wall.

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da
Announcements