I primarily shoot architecture, the exteriors, and the interiors of buildings and always use a tripod. I also shoot various heavy construction machinery & equipment, which I also shoot with a tripod as well as hand-held.
I'm currently shooting a 30MP Canon EOS R, but I'm looking to increase the file sizes to be able to crop in without degrading the image quality, which is the reason for considering the 5Ds r and the R5. And since I also have a Canon R6 II, I don't need either the 5Ds r or the R5 for the occasional video shoot. I'm also going to keep the R as an emergency backup for whatever body I decide to buy.
The big question mark in my mind is whether it's worth spending $1,500 more for the R5 over the 5Ds r?
I'd appreciate some guidance on this issue.
