Hope DPP3.X can support New 1DX2, DPP4 is not good :-(

[WoSoLoo]

DPP3 is much more easy to use, DPP4 too many option and slow

[ebiggs1]

"To each his own, I guess.  LR6 is much faster than DPP3 and DPP4 for most tasks."

Absolutely!  But no matter how much some die hard's brag on DPP whatever number, it is no Photoshop.  Not in the same solar system.  I know of no professional shop that uses DPP in lieu of PS and/or LR.  None.

Thousands of images is where LR shines.  Get me a break, please.  And we haven't mentioned Bridge yet for PS.

"To each his own, I guess."  Is the only plausible response to this debate.

[ebiggs1]

"New 1DX2, DPP4 is not good"

If you bought a 1Dx Mk II and are relying on DPP 4 or 3 or whatever number as your editor, you have more problems than it just not working!  

[TTMartin]

---

@WoSoLoo wrote:

DPP3 is much more easy to use, DPP4 too many option and slow

---

If DPP4 is too slow, it sounds to me like you need a computer upgrade.

[WoSoLoo]

DPP4 is unstable cause it's slow