06-28-2023
01:03 PM
- last edited on
06-28-2023
01:27 PM
by
Danny
hello every one,
I have an EOS R3 mirrorless camera, with the 15-35 RF 2.8 and 28-70 RF 2.0, I take pictures of the night sky, it is a low light environment so I set the parameter accordingly, (F2.8, 15 sec, iso6400), when I acquired the camera the recommendation of canon was not to use the profile of the lens, I did make the change and it corrected in 50%.. I replied with that information but I didn't receive more data. couple weeks ago I went to Goblin Valley UT to picture the Milky Way there this is one of the 21 frames I took for a panoramic stich...the green edges and the low resolution in the bottom
06-29-2023 01:38 PM
I understand that with some post processing the issue can be minimized, but the issue for me is why on a canon flagship camera that spot appears in the frame, I have seen the Sony and Pentax ones because we have processed together and theirs it has nothing comepared to mines, theirs is clean. That’s what I’m trying to figured out.
06-29-2023 03:14 PM
What if you try DPP4? I tried with PureRAW and it gives a green cast hard to get rid of.
06-29-2023 03:32 PM
Peter, thanks for your comment, my question here is why this is happening? I been side by side with a guy with a Sony 7 IV, with the same parameters, and his pictures don't have that green color cast, is there a parameter that I should change? do you guys think it is something wrong with the body?, I appreciate all your comments and solution to try to minimize the issue, but in reality what I want you help for it is to determine what's wrong when I'm shooting in low light
thank you
06-29-2023 03:49 PM
this is a link to a single shot RAW file CR3
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11ftONMlVaZKCtu0eUH4Ji6Ehgv3GgHAo/view?usp=share_link
06-29-2023 04:04 PM - edited 06-29-2023 04:29 PM
Hm, up left PureRAW with lens correction. Up right PureRAW without lens correction.
Below left darktable without lens correction.
In your first picture you got both top corners green. I get just right one in the raw file you uploaded.
Could you please upload the raw file from your first picture here also? I am asking because you have the Milky way at a different place and more to the right corner there. Also the green corners in that picture look like something from a vignetting correction.
This one you uploaded on the other hand doesn't look like something from a vignetting correction.
Have you tried Long Exposure Noise Reduction turned on? What about same settings with lens cap on?
06-29-2023 04:32 PM
here are the other two RAWs CR3 files that I have upload as jpegs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wvS6DSYV3XJ1W5NeF_77ql3L0hMyBSRq/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j4_7SqXgX6mAlst8B-vHTxwCbud4CWDi/view?usp=share_link
thank you
06-29-2023 04:48 PM - edited 06-29-2023 05:11 PM
Left corner, no problem. Right corner looks greenish. Try LENR vs no LENR with same settings and also try to take some dark frames with lens cap on and without LENR. Report back.
Same with your 28-70 RF 2.0?
06-30-2023 03:32 PM
yes, it happens the same with the 28-70 RF F2.0, I will do the frames you are asking duringnthe weekend.
thank you
07-03-2023 03:46 PM
Im inserting a link to 4 files that I did at home with your suggestion of same parameters, adding NR and 3 and 4 with the cap on
File XXXX62 same parameters without NR or CAP on
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17VT5xgr6Y_gII0A2SrfK4y37a9jAQQZy/view?usp=share_link
File XXXX63 same parameters with NR no CAP on
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g8ggKOdqqJL2Huajb459fLNvADhqn528/view?usp=share_link
File XXXX64 same parameters with NR, CAP on
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1joeyQ0ppd3a-H1smfVCdZRQKHyjRW4jJ/view?usp=share_link
File XXXX65 ame parameters without NR, CAP on
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p3uy-n3bKpo3DmXZQTlpPVFRBoArpRJu/view?usp=share_link
07-03-2023 04:35 PM - edited 07-03-2023 05:34 PM
For your two first pictures without lens cap I meant real night pictures of the sky, so try with and without LENR next time you get out there. A bonus is that LENR will clear out those 400 bad pixels but double the exposure time.
It seems you catched a muon in you xxxx63 file.
I increased the brightness by 7,5 EV to make it stand out, but it is visible at 4 EV. Take a look at the thumbnails. LENR (or a dark frame you later use) solves it.
A dark frame should be taken at the same time and temperature, but if I were you I would try to use your XXX65 dark frame together with your astro pictures with 15 seconds exposure and ISO 6400.
Enough said about dark frames and LENR. I have seen a sensor factory calibration with a 550D to reduce fixed pattern noise. I don't know if it is possible to do something similar to R3. You should call Canon and ask. If you find any other R3 owners you can ask if their R3 sensors behave the same.
No LENR
LENR
LENR
No LENR
There is a review about R6 and "amp glow" here, but the exposure time was way longer and that looks like what I have been seeing before with older Canon models at very long shutter speeds https://amazingsky.net/2021/09/23/testing-the-canon-r6-for-astrophotography/
02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.
RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8
RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2
RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3
01/27/2025: New firmware updates are available.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.