10-05-2013 06:02 PM
I currently have the 70-200mm f2.8 L lens and I am wondering if the newer versions are as sharp or sharper.
Thank You
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-07-2013 12:08 PM - edited 10-07-2013 12:08 PM
Yes, the new version is sharper (70-200 2.8 IS Mark II). Does it even matter? Is the increased sharpness going to make a difference in your work? Will you even be able to tell based on the media you display your work in? Is it worth the additional cost?
That’s all up to you. Some say no, some say yes. Most people online say yes. I say no. Red pill or blue pill.
10-09-2013 09:04 AM
I have both the 70-200mm f4L IS USM and the 70-20mm f2.8L IS II USM.
There is nothing the f4 version does better, except weight and price.
There is more to consider in a lens than just sharpness.
Is it worth it to you? Only you can answer that. To me it is and I rarely use the f4 model any longer.
10-07-2013 12:08 PM - edited 10-07-2013 12:08 PM
Yes, the new version is sharper (70-200 2.8 IS Mark II). Does it even matter? Is the increased sharpness going to make a difference in your work? Will you even be able to tell based on the media you display your work in? Is it worth the additional cost?
That’s all up to you. Some say no, some say yes. Most people online say yes. I say no. Red pill or blue pill.
10-08-2013 11:10 PM
Thank you for the response, I know and agree with you. I thought the IS maybe helpful.
Thanks again
10-09-2013 09:04 AM
I have both the 70-200mm f4L IS USM and the 70-20mm f2.8L IS II USM.
There is nothing the f4 version does better, except weight and price.
There is more to consider in a lens than just sharpness.
Is it worth it to you? Only you can answer that. To me it is and I rarely use the f4 model any longer.
10-17-2013 06:28 PM
sigma, however against the canon there is not a big differece - except in price.
10-18-2013 09:43 AM
Well, I have the Sigam, also.
"... however against the canon there is not a big differece ..."
This is as wrong as could possibly be. The Sigma is not an "L". Not in the slightest. Will it make nice photos, yes it will.
But as I said before there is more to a lens than just sharpness. Now if sharpness is your single consideration get the Sigma.
The Canon 70-200mm f2.8 Series II is simply the best 70-200mm there is. Period.
I am fully aware of the cost factor and if it is the main factor, get the Sigma. But, "... however against the canon there is not a big differece ...", is simply not remotely true.
10-18-2013 12:31 PM
10-18-2013 12:34 PM
Thank you, I am going to try to go that way while they have a nice rebate on it now.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.