Lens question settled. Got a WA.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-23-2017 07:49 PM
OK. I just bought the 16-35 f/2.8 III at a real life camera store in Cleveland. (No camera stores in Pittsburgh.). Took it straight to the Cleveland zoo, as payback for the family for a nearly 2-hour drive to Cleveland. I was going back and forth between a budget 3rd party lens and this one but I went this way.
I have only viewed my shots through the camera LCD but two impressions so far:
1.). HOLY COW BUT 16MM IS REALLY WIDE! I will really need to get used to that. I've been shooting for 3 years with a 35mm prime as my walk around lens and 16MM is kind of shocking. I wonder a little if I should have gone with a 24-70 instead, but I am thinking the 16MM will be useful for buildings and big bridges in Europe.
2.). The vignetting at 16MM at f/2.8 is really heavy. You can see it even looking at the images on the back of the camera.
While I was there I also also picked up a Streetwalker to carry it all. It was really nice to do business in a real camera store with real staff and it was especially great to be able to try the backpacks on.
I am deleting a duplicate of this post at the end of my original thread.
Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites
Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-24-2017 06:43 AM
1. Yes, the view from 16mm on a full frame is quite wide. It is a great lens to use in tight spaces.
2. The vignetting is nothing that cannot be corrected in post. You'll notice barrel distortion, too.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-24-2017 10:45 AM
"It was really nice to do business in a real camera store with real staff and it was especially great to be able to try the backpacks on."
There is a lot to be said for this. Even though I pay a little more at my local real deal camera store I feel it is worth it. I have been aloowed to try out lenses on my cameras, try on stuff, etc, nice, very nice.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-24-2017 10:50 AM
The 16-35 f/2.8 II is a fantastic lens. I can only imagine the 16-35 f/2.8 III is better. The 24-70mm f2,8L lives on my Ds3 and the 16-35 f/2.8 II lives on my 1D4. On the 16-35 f/2.8 II, I have not noticed impossible vignetting, a little but not much.
I do lens correction on every single photo I import in to LR. That may be why I don't see it. You should do that as well.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
