
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2016 05:38 AM
Hi Every one ,
wish you agreat day ,
After the Suggestions in this forum for my Camera then my First Lens ... thank you guys i bougth the Canon 6D and i bought the Canon Lens 17-40 Attcched my first couple photos in it ..
Now i am looking for a zoom lens , any suggestions ? with good value for mony ? honestly i am not putting a budget for it yet but not intending to but something so expensive , my favorate style is architecture & cityscape , but some times i may need a zoom lens if go out for some shots that my need more than what i have now ( the canon 17-40 ) ,
thanks for passing & thanks for support in Advance .
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2016 06:27 AM
But what would you use it for? That tells you what focal length to get.
You already have the 17-40 range covered. That can be used for your walk around lens though it stops a little short for that at 40mm. I use a 35mm prime as my walk around and I zoom with my feet so I think you can too.
For or a standard telephoto the best one is the EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS Mk 2. In the US it sells between $1,800.00 and $2,300.00. It is a truly fantastic lens. Sharp. Great colors. Great in low light. Great bokeh. And that focal range is very usable on a full frame camera. Not often is it too long to be useful.
If you need a longer telephoto let us know and folks can suggest longer lenses but the good ones get expensive and you may also lose the nice f/2.8 aperture if you get a longer telephoto. Unless you really spend a lot on a 300mm or 400mm f/2.8.
Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites
Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2016 06:15 AM
Hi Janabi,
Nice shots.
I think you mean to say you want a telephoto lens, not a zoom lens. Lots of folks use those two words interchangeably but telephoto means a long focal length while technically a zoom lens is any lens, like your 17-40 even, which allows you to use a range of different focal lengths.
A telephoto can be a zoom lens (100-400mm, 70-200mm, etc.) but a telephoto can also be a fixed focal length prime (300mm, 400mm, etc.) just so long as it is a long focal length.
Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites
Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2016 06:27 AM
But what would you use it for? That tells you what focal length to get.
You already have the 17-40 range covered. That can be used for your walk around lens though it stops a little short for that at 40mm. I use a 35mm prime as my walk around and I zoom with my feet so I think you can too.
For or a standard telephoto the best one is the EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS Mk 2. In the US it sells between $1,800.00 and $2,300.00. It is a truly fantastic lens. Sharp. Great colors. Great in low light. Great bokeh. And that focal range is very usable on a full frame camera. Not often is it too long to be useful.
If you need a longer telephoto let us know and folks can suggest longer lenses but the good ones get expensive and you may also lose the nice f/2.8 aperture if you get a longer telephoto. Unless you really spend a lot on a 300mm or 400mm f/2.8.
Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites
Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2016 06:52 AM
Yah ,
Thanks for the terms clarifications and definitions ,
Yes i belive will go for this 70-200 Mark 2 ..
thanks scotty , have a nice day .
