cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Should I buy ef lenses for my EOS R6 II?

dikebki1
Apprentice

Hi I was thinking about adding a 70-200 f2.8 to my inventory. The rf mount is very expensive so I thought about buying a used ef mount lens. Some friends of mine said they don’t see any loss of quality with the ef and a adapter, some say there is a lot of loss in quality. I was wondering if you could share your experience and if you have any advice? Thanks 🙂

5 REPLIES 5

deebatman316
Elite
Elite

I would not invest ANY EF lenses if you own an RF Mount camera. Unless there isn’t an RF Mount equivalent lens. Older EF lenses have limitations when adapted to RF Mount cameras. Such as the highly advanced AF system not being fully supported. Or 12 fps being available.

-Demetrius
Bodies: EOS 5D Mark IV
Lenses: EF Holy Trinity, EF 85mm F/1.8 USM
Speedlites: 420EX, 470EX-AI, 550EX & 600EX II-RT

March411
Whiz
Whiz

deebatman316 makes a valid point. For me the question comes with a caveat or two. If you can't afford the RF version and the lenses you are thinking of purchasing are not reaching end of service it may make sense.

I have purchased and still own several EF lenses from both Canon and Sigma. Personally end of service is my biggest consideration. There are three different versions of the lens you inquired about, only the EF70-200 2.8L IS III USM should be a consideration.  

  • EF70-200 2.8L USM: May 2026
  • EF70-200 2.8L IS II USM: May 2025
  • EF70-200 2.8L IS III USM: Undecided

When I asked myself the same questions as you I decided to dive deep, I did in this post I went out and did a fair amount of research. I left my findings in the Canon knowledge base, check out this link there is some decent information with links for reference: Canon (MILC) - Lenses - EF or RF 

Again deebatman316 point is valid, EF lenses are heavier and RF lenses have a 12-pin connection to the camera, while EF lenses have 8 pins. This allows RF lenses to communicate with the camera faster, more efficiently and offer more functionality. That being said, the EF lenses I maintain work far better on my MILC then my DSLR's, fast and overall better keeper rate but they are being mounted on a superior R body.

If you decide to go EF don't make the same mistake I did and try third party adapters, they are very inconsistent! New or used the simple Canon EF - RF adapter will greatly improve the performance of the lens.


Marc
Windy City

R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing

Personal Gallery

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

The RF 70-200 f2.8 is a favorite of mine.  As my colleagues pointed out, investing in EF glass is a losing proposition in the longer run.  If you want the flexibility of being able to use an RF TC, then you'll need to buy the 24-105 Z internal zoom model.  I really like the compactness of the first gen 70-200 and don't mind that it's an external Zoom.  I also rarely use a TC so this is a non-issue for me.  The lens is extremely sharp and high performing.  It's exceptional for portraits and indoor venues with low light.  The EF model has these same attributes.  In the end, however, lenses are your real investment in photography.  Body's come and go.  Have you considered Canon refurbished?

https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/lenses/refurbished-lenses

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

"...the highly advanced AF system not being fully supported. Or 12 fps being available."

 

If you feel, as a lot of people, you don't need or would use these features you will not miss them. Just because a camera can do something doesn't mean much if it isn't something you need. There are some features on my 1 series cameras I never have used.

I doubt you will be able to see a different in IQ unless perhaps you are a pixel peeper and then maybe not. Remember the lens you have is always better than the lens you wished you had.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

March411
Whiz
Whiz

To ebiggs point there are several EF lenses that can't achieve the supported FPS but there are many that can if you are looking for that functionality. The EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM and EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM appear to be supported. Due to end of service the EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM would be your best option.

EF Lenses supporting maximum continuous shooting speed
EF24mm f/2.8 IS USM EF400mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM EF200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x
EF28mm f/2.8 IS USM EF400mm f/2.8L IS III USM EF24-105mm f/4L IS II USM EF-S24mm f/2.8 STM
EF35mm f/1.4L II USM EF400mm f/4 DO IS II USM EF24-70mm f/2.8L II USM EF-S35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM
EF35mm f/2 IS USM EF500mm f/4L IS II USM EF24-70mm f/4L IS USM EF-S10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM
EF40mm f/2.8 STM EF600mm f/4L IS II USM EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
EF50mm f/1.8 STM EF600mm f/4L IS III USM EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM EF-S18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
EF85mm f/1.4L IS USM EF8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM EF70-200mm f/4L IS II USM EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
EF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM EF11-24mm f/4L USM EF70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
EF300mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF16-35mm f/2.8L III USM EF70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM EF-S55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
  EF16-35mm f/4L IS USM EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM  
https://cam.start.canon/en/H001/supplement_0080.html

Marc
Windy City

R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing

Personal Gallery

Announcements