I have both the R6MII and recently got the R7 - purposely for the extra distance of the crop sensor. A couple years ago I bought the RF 24-240mm lens for travel when we were heading out to Nova Scotia. Its a beautiful lens and I am now considering the 70-200 f4L for travel. I will admit I love my L lenses, however have been easing in to the switch over from EF to RF. I have a great collection of lenses with my EF L lenses - however the f2.8 ones are heavy and not easy for travel for me. I recently upgraded my EF 24-105 f4L after it fell to the RF 24-70 f2.8L - I was lucky to find it used from Henrys.
Does anyone have the two lenses that they could compare for me... I don't think I would ever get rid of my RF24-240mm because I love it as a quick grab and go with my RP if we are heading out on the side by side or snowmobile and I can only take one option.
My heart is pulling me to the 70-200 f4L - for the size and weight and of course L quality.
But... how does it compare to the 24-240? Obviously better being the f4L... Im very curious as I do feel such a strong pull here!
