cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Lens recommendations for restaurant videos and food photography

Damiano
Contributor

Hey everyone, so I recently purchased the R8. The main use for the camera will be food photographs, and documenting restaurants. I wanted to know which lens I should use. I would mainly be doing videos of the restaurants showing food and possibly doing interviews with chefs or owners..I see that STM lenses are Way cheaper so my question is, which lens would you recommend? Will the STM be sufficient enough for what I need? I currently have the RF24–50mm F4.5-6.3 STM Thanks 

7 REPLIES 7

kvbarkley
Legend
Legend

Start with what you have. If you feel yourself bumping up against any limits (eg, more/less focal length) , we can discuss options.

Damiano
Contributor

Ok. It’s just that many reviews of the Lens I currently have have been on the negative side. I was thinking of the 24-105, 16 2.8, and 50 1.8? 

Ken Rockwell likes it:

 

but comments that the 24-105 is a little more versatile.

 

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings ,

I think the RF 35 f1.8 should also be considered.  

It's extremely popular, and will do a very nice job for video and food photography.  It's wide aperture will allow you to maintain ambiance  when filming dimly lit venues.  It's also budget friendly.  

The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is another good option as my colleague kvbarkley mentioned.  As long as you have good lighting it's another )budget friendly) great lens.  

For food and video, I don't think a 16mm Is nearly as good a choice over the others.  

 

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.1.2.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 10 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

justadude
Whiz
Whiz

I agree with Rick on the RF 35mm f/1.8 since you said you will be photographing food and doing restaurant videos.  It's a nice focal length for inside restaurants, the f/1.8 will allow more light in dimly lit places, and it is a nice close up lens for food photography.  I think you will feel limited with your current f/4.5-6.3 aperture for what you plan on using it for.

As for your comments on the 50mm f/1.8 or the 16mm f/2.8, while either might be fine for the video work, the 35mm will allow you to get closer for food photography, and the 16mm will be too wide and distort how the plate of food looks.  


Gary
Lake Michigan Area MI

Digital Cameras: Canon EOS R6 Mk ll, EOS R8, EOS RP, ...and a few other brands
Film Cameras: Mostly Pentax, Kodak, and Zenit... and still heavily used

Might just be me... but I think Ken Rockwell likes just about everything.  I started reading Dustin Abbott reviews a while back and I think he is more likely to state the cons as well as the pros, where Ken seems pretty biased in a "It's all good" way in many of his reviews.  Is it just me?


Gary
Lake Michigan Area MI

Digital Cameras: Canon EOS R6 Mk ll, EOS R8, EOS RP, ...and a few other brands
Film Cameras: Mostly Pentax, Kodak, and Zenit... and still heavily used

Damiano
Contributor

Amazing! Thank you all so much! I’ll go with the 35mm 

EOS R6 V RF20-50mm F4 L IS USM PZ Lens Kit
Announcements