Ef 18-55 vs ef 50m

Rgauden
Contributor

I am planning on getting into photography and I was wondering if the canon ef 18-55 or the ef 50mm is better to purchase first. I’m getting the canon eos 70d camera. I will be using it for sports photography 

3 REPLIES 3

rs-eos
Elite
Elite

The 18-55mm would give you more flexibility.  However, for sports, you'll want to look at a lens that could provide more reach.  At 55mm, on a crop-sensor body, that's an equivalent of only 88mm on full frame.  Depending upon where you'll be sitting, subjects would be quite small in the frame.

Consider the EF-S 18-135mm instead.

--
Ricky

Camera: EOS R5 II, RF 50mm f/1.2L, RF 135mm f/1.8L
Lighting: Profoto Lights & Modifiers

normadel
Authority
Authority

For a modestly-priced lens, an EF-S 18-135 would be more useful.....more reach and versatility.  A 50mm would not be very useful at all, especially since the crop factor of 1.6 gives the equivalence of an 80mm lens.Too limiting.

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

Never buy a fixed FL or prime lens as your first and only lens. (unless you know of a specific requirement for it)

"Depending upon where you'll be sitting, subjects would be quite small in the frame."

Absolutely and probably more important what sport.? However, I doubt seriously that the 18-135mm vs the 18-55mm would make a significant difference in whatever sport you are desiring to shoot again depending on the sport. If you need a telephoto you need a telephoto and the 135mm is not that. Without knowing the sport a flat great all around choice is a 70-200mm zoom and would make more sense. But once again too many unknowns to give worthwhile suggestions.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
Announcements