cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ISO Invariance on EOS R5 or R5 Mark II

tangogal
Contributor

Are either the R5 or R5 Mark 2 ISO invariant?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

We love these types of questions. 😍 Yours is a good one.  Yes, both cameras are ISO. Invariant.  A key trait of this feature is dual-based ISO.  Although this applies to video, the camera's sensor in both cameras allows you to underexpose still images using a lower ISO, (maintaining contrast and details in shadows) then raise the exposure in post without amplifying noise introduced by higher ISO  settings.

If you are considering these body's, you should look at the different ways each handles ISO.  Youtube might be a helpful resource.

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

We love these types of questions. 😍 Yours is a good one.  Yes, both cameras are ISO. Invariant.  A key trait of this feature is dual-based ISO.  Although this applies to video, the camera's sensor in both cameras allows you to underexpose still images using a lower ISO, (maintaining contrast and details in shadows) then raise the exposure in post without amplifying noise introduced by higher ISO  settings.

If you are considering these body's, you should look at the different ways each handles ISO.  Youtube might be a helpful resource.

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Peter
Authority
Authority

It seems like the link I posted hanged the webpage here. Glad a moderator removed it.

Here is a print screen instead.

1000017393.jpg

From the author:

"The amount of improvement in the shadow measurement when ISO is increased is what I am calling the PDR Shadow Improvement.

For those shooting raw it can be useful to know when raising ISO in the camera has little or no advantage over applying digital gain in post processing.
(Some people call this property "ISOless". I think that is a very poorly chosen term.)"

R5 and R5 II with electronic shutter will have a different curve. R5 in high speed too.

Peter,

Thanks for mentioning the bit about electronic shutter.  👍

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

I can't read the chart you posted called Photons to Photos. Can you post the link again?

Thanks.


@tangogal wrote:

I can't read the chart you posted called Photons to Photos. Can you post the link again?

Thanks.


https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR_Shadow.htm and click on the camera you are interested in. 

Also https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm 

 

Waddizzle
Legend
Legend

“   A key trait of this feature is dual-based ISO.  Although this applies to video, the camera's sensor in both cameras allows you to underexpose still images using a lower ISO, (maintaining contrast and details in shadows) then raise the exposure in post without amplifying noise introduced by higher ISO  settings. “

Exactly why I typically shoot with -1/3 Ev of compensation. My LR import preset increases the exposure to compensate.  Especially with outdoor landscape photos.

I have been doing this for years, going back to my DSLR days. I would rather under expose shadows than push the limits of highlights.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
Holiday
Announcements