Hello Bazsl,
The good news is that the new LP-E6P battery comes in the box with the new R5 Mark II camera body, along with a new LC-E6 charger. Also, the price of the new LP-E6P battery is the same as the LP-E6NH, $79.99. LP-E6P Features/Description: "Maximize the potential of your Canon EOS R5 Mark II with the LP-E6P rechargeable, high-amperage, lithium-ion battery. Designed to drive the R5 Mark II's 45MP stacked backside-illuminated CMOS sensor as well as the DIGIC X and DIGIC accelerator processor duo, this battery is compatible with Canon LC-E6 and LC-E6E battery chargers". My question is, if you're going to spend $4,299.00 on a R5 Mark II camera, which as mentioned comes with an LP-E6P in the box, why would you not spend $79.99 for an extra LP-E6P battery? Why would you want to use an LP-E6NH battery that's not the recommended battery for the R5 Mark II. Canon developed the LP-E6P for the R5 MK2 for a reason. I have an R6 MK2 with extra LP-E6NH batteries, however, when I preordered the R5 MK2, I also preordered extra LP-E6P batteries. When I receive my new R5 MK2, I will have the right extra batteries for it, as recommended. I for one will follow the manufacturer's instructions when it comes to batteries to use as I want to optimize the performance of the product, especially when there are no price differences or any other benefit to going with a battery that is not meant for the R5 Mark II. Just my thoughts.
Cheers,
Joe
Ancora Imparo
"A good photograph is knowing where to stand."
― Ansel Adams
"There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept."
–- Ansel Adams
"You don’t take a photograph, you make it."
--- Ansel Adams
