cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Canon refurbished lens looks used

scorpionv
Contributor

I bought a refurbished RF lens from canon online. It looks like more of a used lens than a refurbished one. I can return it but need to pay for shipping both ways! This being the case how can we trust Canon when they say refurbished? There is no option to see first and then buy? Have anyone been in this situation?

IMG_1870.jpeg

IMG_1871.jpeg

IMG_1873.jpeg

IMG_1875.jpeg

14 REPLIES 14

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings,

This is a hard for me to answer.  I've purchased many refurb products from Canon.  Several lenses, a flash, and extenders.  Every item has been absolutely perfect.  Free from any marks, blemishes or wear.    

If you aren't happy, I'd call Canon and convey your concerns.  They can't help if you don't let them know.

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Tronhard
VIP
VIP

Hi and welcome to the forum:
I have had occasion to look at the refurbished lens and body sites from time to time.  Reading the small print, the lenses may be in a range of conditions from unused but box open (or even closed), to used.  However, the term refurbished means that the lens is fully operational, not completely pristine necessarily.  For that reason I have seen the same model lens sold for a range of prices that reflect the condition of the lens, but they all function correctly.
So, the question is, does the lens operate properly?  If so, it is within the parameters of a refurbished lens, especially if the price (relative to other similar lenses) was cheaper, thus reflecting the cosmetic condition.


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

I already did. They can’t replace it for some reason and can only return. I need to pay the shipping. They may also deduct their shipping charges from the refund as well!

I understand, but then how does it differ from used/pre-owned? Canon says “Rigorous function and cosmetic inspections are performed by trained Canon technicians so that each refurbished product meets operational specifications”. I don’t think they did the same on the lens I received.

Tintype_18
Authority
Authority

Deducting shipping from the refund is standard. It's rare for a company to cover one's return shipping.

John
Canon EOS T7; EF-S 18-55mm IS; EF 28-135mm IS; EF 75-300mm; Sigma 150-600mm DG

Well, almost all online retailers does. Moreover, if you go through the pictures I posted you can clearly see Canon didn’t honour what they mentioned about rigorous checks on cosmetics. I am not at fault here. Given that Canon doesn’t show the pictures of actual refurbished item they ship, we don’t expect such defects (even though not major) on the same. 

Some of these lenses are used and pre-owned as the text says.  The key to the statement is the phrase "operational specifications", so a lens does not have to look new if they price it at a lower point, but it HAS to WORK like a new unit.   So, does the lens functional correctly - if not you can return it under warranty within the specified period.


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

I think I already made my point clear. You are still leaning towards Canon, not sure why 😀. I wouldn’t have bought that lens for that price if I had seen the picture of the same (or at least a rating of it’s condition) before buying. Now I have to spend considerable amount of money from my pocket just to return it or I should keep it. In either case I am at loss!

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings,

I can see this is really othering you.  I'd send the lens back.  Even if it cost me to do so.  All of my refurbs have been exceptional.  I'd probably be disappointed if I received a lens in that condition.    

Refurbished Products

Products are returned to Canon for a variety of reasons, including overstock balancing, miscellaneous returns from retailers, suspected mis-operation, and minor damage to the box.  Products that are refurbished must pass a comprehensive quality assurance inspection before final packaging and shipment.  Rigorous function and cosmetic inspections are performed by trained Canon technicians so that each refurbished product meets operational specifications and strict cosmetic standards that we have established.  Browse the Canon Online Store's selection of refurbished products by clicking the Refurbished Products link in the Special Offers section of the Canon Online Store homepage.

I don't feel like that lens meets "strict cosmetic standards".  Maybe it does for some people, but not mine.  Some might consider that normal wear.  Bumps, nicks, a minor scratch or two.  It would bug me.  I'll bet the lens works great and would probably last you a life time.  I have personal standards and it sounds like you do too.  I normally buy my lenses new, but I would buy another lens or camera refurb in a heartbeat.  I recently purchased a flash.  It was perfect.  I think you were unlucky in this case.

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Announcements