02-08-2024 02:37 PM - edited 09-03-2024 09:51 PM
I got it the day before yesterday and went out yesterday to test it at my 'happy place'.
Here is a selection of images, shot on the Canon R6MkII, hand-held, available light, seriously downsized in PS to post, with default lens corrections and some cropping.
I was particularly pleased to get three shots of the Serval (the cat). It is reclusive in any case, but because it has incredibly good hearing - it can hear a mouse underground- it is inclined to face away from humanity because we make so much noise.
Overall, I was very impressed with the performance of this lens.
02-08-2024 03:01 PM
You have quite an eye. These are AMAZING! I especially like the image of the lemur. The detail in the eyes is striking.
Thank you for sharing Trevor.
02-08-2024 03:05 PM - edited 02-08-2024 03:10 PM
Thank you, kind sir! Also, thanks for adding the ref to the lens, it did not seem to come up when I tried myself.
They are all amazing creatures. Since NZ is a land of birds, to photograph anything else requires a trip to the zoo or overseas, but the former is cheaper, and I can be home for lunch!
02-08-2024 03:47 PM
Congratulations on the photos, Trevor. Different species and gorgeous colours. The lens gives amazing results. A perfect price-performance lens. Canon has done a great job.
02-08-2024 03:55 PM - edited 07-05-2024 06:28 PM
Thank you. I was trying to shoot a range of subjects at different focal lengths and shutter speeds to gauge the performance of the lens and give it a good workout. I think it's a keeper.
I do have a Sigma 60-600s that I shall retain, because it also works with my DSLRs, and the focal range is amazing! The 200-800 is another step up in FL though. I might try shooting the moon on my R5 as it gets bigger, and see how it behaves on a 1.6 crop - that would be an Equivalent FoV of 320-1280mm, which is up there with super tele bridge cameras.
06-05-2024 09:09 PM
Thank you! I think the lens fills a unique focal range slot. Hitherto, I had been shooting with the RF 100-500 and Sigma 60-600s, both of which I keep but obviously offer different magnifications. They have kept the price quite low and the weight down: the latter thanks to engineered plastics which seem to work fine.
The only drawbacks for me are:
- I wish the tripod mount was like that of the EF 100-400MkII, the foot itself being detachable from the ring around the lens.
- It s a shame that the tripod foot is not Swiss Arca plate compatible
- I really appreciate the inclusion of a lens hood with a non-L lens: that's a huge step forward, however if they were to make it less susceptible to showing scratches and marks - maybe include a rubber area around the open end to make it a bit more robust for when one is inclined to rest the lens nose-down on the lens hood, which is a pretty common thing to do - certainly the Sigma 60-600s has that feature.
None of these are game-changers and don't in any way detract from the optical performance of the lens.
02-08-2024 04:39 PM
Trevor,
Well done as always. I applaud you.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
02-08-2024 04:40 PM
Thank you so much Rick, that's extremely generous and much appreciated.
02-09-2024 08:40 AM
One does not appreciate the variety of wildlife in other countries. Trevor, you have posted some outstanding photos. Thanks for sharing plus sharing the settings and equipment used.
02-09-2024 11:16 AM - edited 02-09-2024 01:24 PM
Thanks John. I always do think EXIF data offers a little more context and value to these postings.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.