Canon Community Canon Community
 


Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 3,637
Registered: ‎06-11-2013

Re: 300mm or maybe not.

A 5% rounding error is fairly typical for lenses... e.g. if a lens was marked "100mm" focal length and actually had a 96mm focal length... that would be ok.

 

Canon's 70-200mm lenses maintain the focal length to within 5% as you focus.  That lens (at the 200mm end) turns out to be something like 190mm if you focus to the closest focusing distance.  It's unique becaue the 3rd party lenses in the same category all breathe quite heavily... they're something like 130-140mm (even though the zoom ring indicates 200) when focused to closest focusing distance (so it's more like a 30-35% reduction vs. Canon's 5% reduction).

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da
VIP
Posts: 9,803
Registered: ‎12-07-2012

Re: 300mm or maybe not.

"A 5% rounding error is fairly typical for lenses..."

 

I was not trying to justify or condemn it just stating the fact.

 

"...becaue the 3rd party lenses in the same category all breathe quite heavily... "

 

Not all.  Some to most, yes, but not all.  To a point the Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 also falls into that category of 'heavy breather'.  Hardly a 3rd party lens!

EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV, along with, a lot of other stuff.
powered by Lithium

LIKE US on Facebook FOLLOW US on Twitter WATCH US on YouTube CONNECT WITH US on Linkedin WATCH US on Vimeo FOLLOW US on Instagram SHOP CANON at the Canon Online Store
© Canon U.S.A., Inc.   |    Terms of Use   |    Privacy Statement