cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50

Rgauden
Contributor

I was planning on originally getting the cannon 70D but heard to look into something different. I found the R50 for like $20 more and was wondering if that’s the better choice? Thanks for the help.

3 REPLIES 3

rs-eos
Elite
Elite

Do you have any existing lenses? If so, what kind? For example, if you have EF or EF-S and opt to going with the EOS R50, you'd need an adapter ($99).

If you're starting new, the EOS R50 would be the way to go.  Be sure to budget lenses.  Look at either RF-S or RF lenses.

--
Ricky

Camera: EOS R5 II, RF 50mm f/1.2L, RF 135mm f/1.8L
Lighting: Profoto Lights & Modifiers

I don’t have any lenses yet, if I were to get the cannon 18-55mm and the cannon 70-200 would I need an adapter 

If you're looking at RF lenses (e.g. the RF-S 18-45mm; note that this RF version only goes to 45mm), you do not need an adapter.  Since you're starting new, I'd strongly recommend sticking with RF lenses.

However, if you're on a budget and want to pick up potentially cheaper EF-S or EF lenses, then yes, you'd need an adapter for those.

--
Ricky

Camera: EOS R5 II, RF 50mm f/1.2L, RF 135mm f/1.8L
Lighting: Profoto Lights & Modifiers
Announcements