cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

IDxII shortfalls.

Edward
Enthusiast

The lack of Wi-Fi, HDR capability, a full touch LCD with automatic brightness control (as in the 5D series), short battery life and failure to reduce size and weight are disappointing. The card slots arrangement is strange, both cards fronts should have faced in the same direction when inserting and the Slot 1 selected for the CFast card instead of the old Compact Flash. The improvements in image quality and autofocus performance in my opinion, are minimal compared to the previous model, not to mention the competition. And the dual battery charger; why not a charger for a single battery or having an option for buying one? In these days of flying, any reduction in size and weight makes the gear easy to carry and accepted as a carry-on v.s. a check-in---international airlines are limiting carry-ons to just one not to exceed to 9 kilos.

 

­

Ergonomically the camera's undersized control buttons make it difficult to use with gloves in cold weather, and the failure to provided illuminated ones make them hard to see at nighttime (Yes Canon, there is nightime photography). When using long telephotos handheld or on a tripod, the 3 control buttons on the top left of the camera are hard to operate and should have been positioned as in the 5D series or 7DII for ease of use and conformity of design. This change would also have resulted in a cleaner top deck look and reduction in control buttons for the 1DxII. The remote control terminal at the bottom of the handgrip should have been moved to the front left as in the current 5DIV, its present location interferes when handholding the 1DxII when devices are attached.

 

Most camera manufacturers release professional gear having the best technologies that then trickles down into cheaper models; Canon has this reversed. As an example, touch screen has now moved up to the 5DIV; it could have been incorporated into the 1DxII. T­his stingy marketing strategy of small incremental improvements causes Canon sales; the reason why I am not purchasing a 5DIV and may skip the 1DxIII too.

35 REPLIES 35

Could not find the direct msg the moderator sent me.


@Jenine wrote:

Hello Edward!

Welcome to the Canon Forums and thanks for your post! We have sent you a direct message regarding your this matter. Please check there for further instructions. We look forward to your reply.


 

Hi Edward!

 

We checked and our message was sent. Please click the envelope at the top of the page under the "General Discussion" tab. If you are still having trouble please let us know. 

Jenine,

If you truly want to improve the next 1D Mk XX, instead of trying to make a high dollar P&S out if it, tell the engineers to improve the sensor.  And get rid of the AA filter.  The last 'new' Canon cameras, 5D Mk IV and 1Dx Mk II, have fallen severely behind in sensor technology.

 

This is what the pros want in the next camera but I am sure Canon  has already heard about that!

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!


@ebiggs1 wrote:

Jenine,

If you truly want to improve the next 1D Mk XX, instead of trying to make a high dollar P&S out if it, tell the engineers to improve the sensor.  And get rid of the AA filter.  The last 'new' Canon cameras, 5D Mk IV and 1Dx Mk II, have fallen severely behind in sensor technology.

 

This is what the pros want in the next camera but I am sure Canon  has already heard about that!


Suggest you enter your own requests, glad that others recognize issues with Canon not competing.  Yo can send your camera to have the AA filter removed. 


@Edward wrote:

@ebiggs1 wrote:

Jenine,

If you truly want to improve the next 1D Mk XX, instead of trying to make a high dollar P&S out if it, tell the engineers to improve the sensor.  And get rid of the AA filter.  The last 'new' Canon cameras, 5D Mk IV and 1Dx Mk II, have fallen severely behind in sensor technology.

 

This is what the pros want in the next camera but I am sure Canon  has already heard about that!


Suggest you enter your own requests, glad that others recognize issues with Canon not competing.  Yo can send your camera to have the AA filter removed. 


AA filter removal is more a marketing gimmick than falling behind in technology. As for Canon falling behind in sensor technology, someone has spent too much time and is giving DXOMark too much credence. 

"... falling behind in technology. As for Canon falling behind in sensor technology, someone has spent too much time and is giving DXOMark ..."

 

Right from the keyboard of the King of Review Readers.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!

Do not read DXO Mark, did not mention sensor.


ebiggs1 wrote:

Jenine,

If you truly want to improve the next 1D Mk XX, instead of trying to make a high dollar P&S out if it, tell the engineers to improve the sensor.  And get rid of the AA filter.  The last 'new' Canon cameras, 5D Mk IV and 1Dx Mk II, have fallen severely behind in sensor technology.

 

This is what the pros want in the next camera but I am sure Canon  has already heard about that!


Fallen behind whom and in what way? That's an assertion that surely deserves some qualitative and quantitative justification, particularly in the case of the 5D4.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA

"Fallen behind whom and in what way?"

 

Nikon D5, nough said.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!


ebiggs1 wrote:

"Fallen behind whom and in what way?"

 

Nikon D5, nough said.


If that's your answer, I can see why you didn't quote my sentence about qualitative and quantitative justification being needed.

 

That said, it's not a bad thing for Brand N to pull ahead now and then. Fierce competition keeps both companies sharp and makes their products better. Canon will pull ahead again; they always do.

 

There are few enough good things about the capitalist system. We might as well appreciate those that are.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA
Announcements