cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

70 d lens

Krejworx
Contributor

Just bought me a 70 with a 18-135mm kit lens.what are good quality not so expensive lens to matcg this.Looking at a 70-200mm f4 iS.Any recommendations??

3 REPLIES 3

ScottyP
Authority

The 70-200 f/4 is a fantastic value.  Super sharp.   Hard to go wrong with that.  

 

What do you shoot, though?  Landscapes?  Kids?  Sports?  Portraits?  Any need for indoor low light capability?

 

 

Scott

Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites

Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?

amfoto1
Authority

Why do you feel you need something else? How is the lens you've got now coming up short? Not wide enough? Not long enough? Not able to render a strongly out of focus background? Not able to focus close enough?

 

Until you can tell us what you are missing, it's pretty hard to recommend a lens.

 

The EF 70-200/4 IS USM is an excellent telezoom... if that's what you need.

 

***********


Alan Myers
San Jose, Calif., USA
"Walk softly and carry a big lens."
GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
FLICKR & EXPOSUREMANAGER 

I agree with Alan Myers.   The focal length isn't really any better. Longer on one side but shorter on the other.

Your requirements?

The 70-200mm f4 is better in every other spec and way you can measure it, though.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!
Announcements