cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

What should my first sense be for EOS T5 camera

lwswood
Apprentice

What should my first lense be?

6 REPLIES 6

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

Buy the T5 kit with lenses.  As good a place to start as any! Smiley Happy

Look for Canon EOS Rebel T5 DSLR Camera with 18-55mm and 75-300mm Lenses Kit.  Around $450.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!

Waddizzle
Legend
Legend

Most EOS T5 camers come in a kit with budget standard zoom lens.  Usually the cost of kits with a single lens are identical to the cost of just the camera body.  Get an exchange, if you can.

 

If not, a good starter lens would be standard zoom, more on what that means later.  First, a short lens tutorial.   Lens, come in two basic styles;  lenses with a fixed focal length, known as a prime; and lenses with a variable focal length, known as z zoom.

 

Second, lens come in a variety of focal lengths: wide, standard, telephoto, and ultra telephoto.  Lenses with focal lengths between 35mm and 85mm are thought of as standard lenses because they come close to a field of view that reproduces what the eye can see. 

 

Lenses with focal lengths below 35mm are thought of as wide angle.  And, lenses with focal lengths of 10mm or lower are considered ultra-wide lenses, with some being described as fish-eye.

 

Lenses with focal lengths ranging from about 100mm to 300mm are considered to be telephoto lenses.  Lenses with focal lengths ranging from 300mm and higher are considered to be ultra-telephoto.

 

A standard zoom would be a zoom lens that covers the range of "standard" focal lengths, with most extending just a bit below and/or above the range.  Canon lenses come in two basic varieties, both of which are identified by their model number: EF or EF-S.  The two lens types are optimized two work with Canon's two basic types of DSLR cameras, which are distinguished by their sensor size:  a full-frame, 35mm sensor; or a the smaller, APS-C sensor, which is often referred to as cropped.

 

Canon has been selling lenses for decades, and as a result they have a variety of generations, or families, of lenses.  The differences [the model numbers] between the generations reflect improvements in lens quality and manufacturing.  However, Canon has always offered a line of professional grade lenses, which can be easily identified with an "L" designation at the end of the model number.  All "L" series lenses are designed for their professional grade full frame sensor camera bodies, and so they should always have a model number that starts with "EF".

 

Lastly, Canon offers two basic types of DSLR cameras, and two basic types of DSLR lenses.  The consumer oriented, APS-C sensor body cameras can use either types of lens, EF or EF-S.  The professional performance oriented, full frame sensor camera bodies can only use the EF types of lenses.

 

I suggested a standard zoom lens, assuming that you have no lens.  The EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Lens is one of the lenses that can be included as part of a camera and lens kit.  Kit lenses are usually of the inexpensive variety, are primarily intended to get you started, not to take great pictures.  Although, you can take great pictures if you take your time and carefully compose a shot. 

 

Grandma's First Spring Rose

 

That shot was taken with a Rebel T5 using the standard 18-55mm kit lens, with the camera mounted on a tripod.  Notice how the subject is in bright sunshine, and that sunshine is behind the camera.  The shot was not taken in "A" mode, because I wanted to use control the ISO setting, and use as fast a shutter speed as was practical.  Getting as muich light into the camera, as quickly as possible, is one trick to getting sharp photos.

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------
"The right mouse button is your friend."

ScottyP
Authority

Good summary. 

 

Do do on the T5 glories of lens are different due to the 1.6 times focal length multiplier.  A 35mm lens, for example, is not at all wide on a rebel.

Scott

Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites

Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?

Autocorrect hurt me there.  

 

Do keep in mind the crop factor.  Your field of view is narrowed, which looks as if your lens focal length is multiplied by 1.6 compared to how a given focal length would look on a full frame camera.   So 35mm will not be the threshold between wide angle and normal; that threshold will be a lower lens, roughly 22mm.  

 

Note however that this conversion only goes as far as the field of view.  Depth of field will not be as shallow as that of a lens of the longer focal length on a full frame camera, and unflattering lens distortions of a wider lens shot close-up will not diminish as they would if you actually mounted a longer lens. 

Scott

Canon 5d mk 4, Canon 6D, EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS mk2; EF 16-35 f/2.8 L mk. III; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 "Art" EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro; EF 85mm f/1.8; EF 1.4x extender mk. 3; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS; 3x Phottix Mitros+ speedlites

Why do so many people say "FER-tographer"? Do they take "fertographs"?


@ScottyP wrote:

Autocorrect hurt me there.  

 

Do keep in mind the crop factor.  Your field of view is narrowed, which looks as if your lens focal length is multiplied by 1.6 compared to how a given focal length would look on a full frame camera.   So 35mm will not be the threshold between wide angle and normal; that threshold will be a lower lens, roughly 22mm.  

 

Note however that this conversion only goes as far as the field of view.  Depth of field will not be as shallow as that of a lens of the longer focal length on a full frame camera, and unflattering lens distortions of a wider lens shot close-up will not diminish as they would if you actually mounted a longer lens. 


Or to put it in slightly more general terms: Cropping does not change the distance between the camera and the subject nor alter any visual effects that are a consequence thereof.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA

TCampbell
Elite
Elite

Is this really your first lens... or your 2nd?  (did you actually get a Canon T5 "body only" with no lens?)

 

The "first" lens should be the kit lens -- and that's the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

 

But if you had the choice, the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is a better lens (note the "STM" instead of the "II" at the end.)

 

Your "second" lens depends on what you enjoy shooting.

 

You might enjoy the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM if you enjoy shooting in low light or shallow depth of field with blurred backgrounds (great for portraits).  

 

My own "second" lens was an EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II... but I found that I hardly ever used it and probably should have chosen something else (today there's an "STM" version of that lens as well.  In general, Canon has been revising many of these lenses and providing improved optics and the new nearly-silent "STM" focusing motor which is also a bit more responsive (faster to focus) than the lenses they replace (but you can still get the older lenses).  The "STM" versions cost about $50 more than the previous generation of the same lens but considering the improved optics, improved focus speed, and significantly quieter operating those lenses are worth every penny of that extra $50.

 

Unless you have a purpose where you think you'd regularly use a telephoto zoom... I would suggest the 50mm f/1.8 STM ... it's probably the best bargain in the entire lineup considering it only costs about $125 and it's focal ratio is so low that it's excellent when you run into poor lighting (just about everyone complains about shooting in very poor lighting at some point early on in their photography journey.)  

 

The low focal ratio of the 50mm f/1.8 means it collects more light while the shutter is open.  If you compare it to, say, the kit lens (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 at the 50mm focal length) then the kit lens is shooting wide open at f/5.6 whereas the 50mm f/1.8 can shoot at... well f/1.8.   f/1.8 is roughly TEN TIMES MORE LIGHT than f/5.6 (no kidding!)  It makes a huge difference in low light situations.  

 

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da
Announcements