cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Mixed Internal peripheral illumination/chromatic aberration correction

Antares86
Contributor

Dear all

 

I have a problem with batch-processing images from my recent trip. For some photos I had the camera-internal peripheral illumination + chromatic aberration correction turned on, while for others I have them turned off.

 

Is there a way to find out which have the said corrections and which have not, so that I can subsequently apply the corrections in Lightroom correctly to all my photos (and avoid applying it twice)?

 

thanks and best wishes

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

For a RAW image the camera doesn't modify the image; it applies a tag that Canon DPP can read to apply the corrections. Adobe softare can't read/apply the tag.

 

But when i have used Canon DPP and switched the corrections on/off an aeffect isn't always apparent because the lens may not have a significant issue that needs to be corrected.

 

I see this especially when using full-frame EF lenses on a crop sensor camera. The edges of the lens, where correction is needed more, are not being captured by the reduced field of view.

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, LR Classic

View solution in original post

16 REPLIES 16

jrhoffman75
Legend

If you are processing RAW images in Lightroom then the in-camera settings don't matter. They are only read by Canon DPP.

 

 

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, LR Classic

I am currently trying to edit in Lightroom CC (to save time) and -a least from a quick first look - it seems that many of my images are already corrected.

Is it the same in LR CC?

Are you processing RAW or JPEG images?

 

https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2362401

 

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, LR Classic

I am processing RAW.

For a RAW image the camera doesn't modify the image; it applies a tag that Canon DPP can read to apply the corrections. Adobe softare can't read/apply the tag.

 

But when i have used Canon DPP and switched the corrections on/off an aeffect isn't always apparent because the lens may not have a significant issue that needs to be corrected.

 

I see this especially when using full-frame EF lenses on a crop sensor camera. The edges of the lens, where correction is needed more, are not being captured by the reduced field of view.

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, LR Classic

Thanks for clearing that up for me! 😊

Actually the answers are just partly correct.  In the case of raw files, thumbnails that are automatically generated by your camera tells Lightroom how to generate a thumbnail and preview based upon that thumbnail, or jpg image.  Lightrooms default settings will be applied later as the preview continues.  So in a way the in camera settings do effect what LR is importing.

 

The good thing about Raw files is the greater latitude of adjustments that can be made.  Not the fact they are influenced, or not, by the cameras settings.  The mere fact that you can view a Raw file suggests it was modified.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and several lenses!

Don't get me wrong, the Raw file itself is not altered in any way just what you get to see is.

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and several lenses!


@ebiggs1 wrote:

Don't get me wrong, the Raw file itself is not altered in any way just what you get to see is.


That is temporary, until Lightroom generates its own preview file.

 

Try this experiment:

 

1. take a photo using RAW and the Monochrome Picture Style.

2. import into Lightroom    

3. the initial view in the Import window will be monochrome\

4. select Import

5. the file will be imported and once the LR preview generation ends the file will be in color

6. that's because LR will not read any in-camera applied settings

 

The only in-camera effect that will transfer to LR is Long Exposure Noise Removal. Tha's because the actual RAW file is modified in-camera the black frame noise signal is subtracted from the original image.

 

 

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, LR Classic
Announcements
01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for EOS R6 Mark II
01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a Canon Precision Alignment
01/03/2023: Welcome to CES 2023!
12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for EOS C70
12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for EOS R5
12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for EOS R6
11/22/2022: New firmware available for EOS R3, EOS R7 and EOS R10
11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the Best Employers for Veterans in 2022 by Forbes.
08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for RF 70-200mm L IS USM
08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for CR-N 300
08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for CR-N 500
07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for CR-X300
06/10/2022: Service Notice:UPDATE: Canon Inkjet Printer continuous reboot loop or powering down
06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for PowerShot G7 X Mark III
05/31/2022: Did someone SAY Badges?
05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for EOS-C500 Mark II
05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for EOS-C300 Mark III
05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a Canon Maintenance Service
05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the ranking scale within the community!
04/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1.1 is available for EOS R5 C
03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for EOS-C70
02/09/2022: Share Your Photos is back!
02/07/2022: New firmware version 1.6.1 is available for EOS-1DX Mark III
01/19/2022: READY FOR ANYTHING EOS-R5 C
01/13/2022: Community Update. We will be retiring the legacy profile avatars on 01/20/2022. Click this link to read more.