cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

7D Mark II noise at low iso

thegios
Enthusiast

This is a 3:1 crop taken with a 7D Mark II with a Canon 17-55 f2.8 lens at 17mm f11 iso 100 1/200 sec: is it normal such a noise on the sky?

 

Cattura.JPG

15 REPLIES 15

thegios
Enthusiast
TCampbel: that's exactly what I do 😉

ebiggs1: I always use neutral picture style with all values set to zero, to avoid LR from interpreting wrongly any in camera picture style while importing

"... to avoid LR from interpreting wrongly any in camera picture style while importing"

 

OK, I think you have a good understanding how LR works.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

Peter
Authority
Authority

Photon shot noise:

 

"An important characteristic of fluctuations obeying Poisson statistics is that their standard deviation -- the typical fluctuation away from the average in the typical count -- is equal to the square root of the average count itself. That is, if 10000 photons are collected on average, the typical fluctuation away from this average number of photons will be about 100 -- the counts will typically range from about 9900 to 10100. If instead on average 100 photons are collected, the variation from count to count will be +/- 10. Thus, as the signal grows, the photon shot noise also grows, but more slowly; and the signal-to-noise ratio increases as the square root of the number of photons collected. The higher the illumination, the less apparent the shot noise; the lower the illumination, the more apparent it is."

 

Below is the raw histogram from your raw file. You could have collected a lot more photons before clipping the highlights.

 

Skärmbild från 2018-08-05 09-21-17.png

thegios
Enthusiast
Translated: pic is underexposed and therefore noise is higher, I could have increased exposition (as I had plenty of room) to minimize the noise?

Correct?


@thegios wrote:
Translated: pic is underexposed and therefore noise is higher, I could have increased exposition (as I had plenty of room) to minimize the noise?

Correct?

Correct. Collect more light. To check the raw histogram I have used RawTherapee.

Peter excellent conclusion and explanation. Smiley Happy

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
Holiday
Announcements
12/15/2025: New firmware update available for EOS C50 - Version 1.0.1.1

11/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.

EOS R6 Mark III - Version 1.0.1

EOS R3 - Version 2.0.0

EOS R1 - Version 1.2.0

EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.2.0

EOS R5 - Version 2.2.1

PowerShot G7 X Mark III - Version 1.4.0

PowerShot SX740 HS - Version 1.0.2


10/21/2025: Service Notice: To Users of the Compact Digital Camera PowerShot V1

10/15/2025: New firmware updates are available.

Speedlite EL-5 - Version 1.2.0

Speedlite EL-1 - Version 1.1.0

Speedlite Transmitter ST-E10 - Version 1.2.0


07/28/2025: Notice of Free Repair Service for the Mirrorless Camera EOS R50 (Black)

07/24/2025: New firmware updates are available.


07/23/2025: New firmware updates are available.

EOS R5C - Version 1.1.1.1

EOS C80 - Version 1.0.3.1


7/17/2025: New firmware updates are available.

EOS R7 - Version 1.7.1

EOS R10 - Version 1.7.0

EOS R8 - Version 1.5.0

EOS R50 - Version 1.4.0

Powershot V10 - Version 1.4.0

Powershot V1 - Version 1.1.0

EOS R50V - Version 1.1.1


05/21/2025: New firmware update available for EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.5.1

02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.

RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6

RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9

RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8

RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2

RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3


01/22/2024: Canon Supports Disaster Relief Efforts in California
01/14/2025: Steps to resolve still image problem when using certain SanDisk SD cards with the Canon EOS R5 Mark II