11-29-2023 10:33 AM - edited 11-29-2023 10:35 AM
Going to Kenya and Tanzania for 2 weeks in January. My primary camera is the R5 with a RF 100-500 lens. Secondary camera is a R6M2. Trying to decide on lens for R6M2.
Own both the RF 24-240 and the RF 24-105 F/4 lenses. Can only take one of these two. See advantages and disadvantages of both. What would you choose?
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-29-2023 10:39 AM - edited 11-29-2023 10:40 AM
Since you have the longer focal lengths covered with your R5 setup, I would go with the RF 24-105mm f/4. It would be the better optic and also a tad lighter than the 24-240. Plus, the constant f/4 aperture.
11-29-2023 02:57 PM
Yep, I agree with Ricky. The 24-240 is a brilliant optic but it's not a constant aperture and that would be the clincher.
11-29-2023 10:39 AM - edited 11-29-2023 10:40 AM
Since you have the longer focal lengths covered with your R5 setup, I would go with the RF 24-105mm f/4. It would be the better optic and also a tad lighter than the 24-240. Plus, the constant f/4 aperture.
11-29-2023 02:57 PM
Yep, I agree with Ricky. The 24-240 is a brilliant optic but it's not a constant aperture and that would be the clincher.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.