cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Thoughts on Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L ii

khairka9
Apprentice

What’s the reason that this one gets a bad name and less recommended than version 1 as well.

I am getting a new one for $500 but all the negative comments and lack of popularity is making me think twice.

I will use it for landscapes and may try for milkyway photography.

Have an APS-C camera

1 REPLY 1

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings,

I owned the mkII for over 5 yrs.  While any product can get a bad review, that was not my experience with this lens.  I used it for landscapes and architecture.  Mine was top performing and super sharp.  Maybe others have more to offer about theirs.  

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, +RF 1.4x TC, +Canon Control Ring, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve ~Windows11 Pro ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8
~CarePaks Are Worth It

Avatar
Announcements