03-08-2024 01:04 PM - last edited on 03-08-2024 02:10 PM by Danny
Using a 100-400mm in combination with 2x extender III on Rebel T7 or 90D. Once the extender is installed I cannot drop below F9 but AF won't work past F8. Any suggestions?
03-08-2024 01:17 PM
You will lose all ability to autofocus. The 90D will autofocus with a 1.4x, but not the T7.
03-08-2024 01:45 PM
Manual focus.
03-08-2024 02:04 PM
Auto focus in live view only.
03-08-2024 06:37 PM - edited 03-08-2024 06:40 PM
Follow the advice of my colleagues.
For Reference:
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
03-09-2024 01:36 PM
Whether it works and/or AF is available or not, it is a bad idea any way. The 100-400mm zoom doesn't have the IQ to give up to be able to use a 2x tel-con. IMHO, of course others have different standards. Personally I wouldn't even use the 1.4 tel-con with it.
03-09-2024 01:53 PM
You will get as good or better results by using the bare lens and cropping in post. And you won't take the AF speed penalty or the loss of light penalty.
One of the AI tools like DxO Pure Raw or Topaz Photo AI can improve the image in post.
03-09-2024 02:46 PM - edited 03-09-2024 02:55 PM
@jrhoffman75 wrote:You will get as good or better results by using the bare lens and cropping in post. And you won't take the AF speed penalty or the loss of light penalty.
One of the AI tools like DxO Pure Raw or Topaz Photo AI can improve the image in post.
I disagree. I do not see AI hallucinations as an improvement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination_(artificial_intelligence)
For enlarging up to 200%, I think that bicubic interpolation is better. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicubic_interpolation , especially Lancoz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling
https://www.rsok.com/~jrm/2024Feb09_SaltPlainsNWR/2024feb09_kestrel_IMG_8938c.html
https://www.rsok.com/~jrm/2024Feb09_SaltPlainsNWR/IMG_8938cs2.JPG
https://www.rsok.com/~jrm/2024Feb09_SaltPlainsNWR/2024feb09_kestrel_IMG_8938cs4.jpg
03-10-2024 11:18 AM
" And you won't take the AF speed penalty or the loss of light penalty."
Even if post processing is good you still can't eliminate what JohnH opined. Or, perhaps the same results as stated done with cropping in post. We all have our standards which may be different.
03-11-2024 06:40 AM
@ebiggs1 wrote:" And you won't take the AF speed penalty or the loss of light penalty."
Even if post processing is good you still can't eliminate what JohnH opined. Or, perhaps the same results as stated done with cropping in post. We all have our standards which may be different.
Post processing.
For low noise images, the small aperture diffraction blur can be removed. The "capture sharpening" in rawtherapee does this. The "digital lens optimizer" in DPP does this. The Richardson/Lucy deconvolution in the GMIC plugin for gimp does this, but it is important not to have any sharpening in other software before doing this in gimp.
The Kestrel image was made using the "Standard" picture style which was the starting point for DPP. All of the changes made from the standard style in DPP are listed below. To me this seems like minimal post processing. Auto lighting optimizer and peripheral illumination correction and distortion correction were turned off in the camera menus. I changed white balance from auto to daylight in DPP.
To me, this image seems to be an accurate representation of the Kestrel. I am sorry that it does not meet your standards. I could not get closer to the bird. The slower AF with extender is necessary to compensate for the 2 times larger focus step, otherwise there would not be accurate focus.
[CanonVRD:Image] White Balance Adj : Daylight
[CanonVRD:Image] Color Saturation Adj : 1 [CanonVRD:Image] DLO Setting : 65 [CanonVRD:Image] Gamma Unsharp Mask Strength : 3 [CanonVRD:Image] Gamma Unsharp Mask Fineness : 1.7 [CanonVRD:Image] Gamma Unsharp Mask Threshold : 3 [CanonVRD:Image] DPRAW Microadjust Back Front : 1 [CanonVRD:Image] DPRAW Microadjust Strength : 8 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop X : 542 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Y : 657 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Width : 3600 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Height : 2400 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Rotation : 0 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Original Width : 5088 [CanonVRD:Image] Crop Original Height : 3392
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.