<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Suggest printer &amp;amp; stock? in Professional Photo Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/73570#M799</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I need a new printer and new print stock.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I print professional-quality sports cards for a variety of clients.&amp;nbsp; Demand keeps going up, and I need a more efficient (cost-effective) method.&amp;nbsp; Currently, this is how I do it:&lt;BR /&gt;1) Print card fronts on 8.5x11 glossy photo paper&lt;BR /&gt;2) Print card backs on 8.5x11 matte photo paper&lt;BR /&gt;3) Align and glue the pages&lt;BR /&gt;4) Cut the cards from the pages (9 per page)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surely, there is a better way to do this, right?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a heavy stock (baseball card heavy) that will allow photo-quality printing on the front and back (ideally, glossy on one side and matte on the other)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Which of your printers can be (very accurately) offest-aligned, so that the front and back printing matches up perfectly?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tell me what to buy!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ron&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 23:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rondemarse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-08T23:08:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggest printer &amp; stock?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/73570#M799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need a new printer and new print stock.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I print professional-quality sports cards for a variety of clients.&amp;nbsp; Demand keeps going up, and I need a more efficient (cost-effective) method.&amp;nbsp; Currently, this is how I do it:&lt;BR /&gt;1) Print card fronts on 8.5x11 glossy photo paper&lt;BR /&gt;2) Print card backs on 8.5x11 matte photo paper&lt;BR /&gt;3) Align and glue the pages&lt;BR /&gt;4) Cut the cards from the pages (9 per page)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surely, there is a better way to do this, right?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a heavy stock (baseball card heavy) that will allow photo-quality printing on the front and back (ideally, glossy on one side and matte on the other)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Which of your printers can be (very accurately) offest-aligned, so that the front and back printing matches up perfectly?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tell me what to buy!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ron&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 23:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/73570#M799</guid>
      <dc:creator>rondemarse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-08T23:08:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest printer &amp; stock?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167766#M3044</link>
      <description>Great question. Covers a lot of ground. Canon Print Studio Pro is the print plug in Canon wants you to use with your Canon pro-printer. I would like to see how this is done in the software. Also, I wonder if you can get glossy and matte on the same stock. Can't wait to see responses.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167766#M3044</guid>
      <dc:creator>waq44</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-18T18:20:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest printer &amp; stock?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167768#M3045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&amp;nbsp; We may be waiting a long time though, since the original post was over two years ago.&amp;nbsp; After awhile, I took the silence to mean "Canon can't do that."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:23:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167768#M3045</guid>
      <dc:creator>rondemarse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-18T18:23:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggest printer &amp; stock?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167789#M3046</link>
      <description>Silly me, I only saw Mar 8. How did you solve your problem?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Suggest-printer-amp-stock/m-p/167789#M3046</guid>
      <dc:creator>waq44</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-18T23:40:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

