<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pro-100 and Pro-10 prints noticeably better than i9900 prints? in Professional Photo Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Pro-100-and-Pro-10-prints-noticeably-better-than-i9900-prints/m-p/29599#M211</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pro-100 uses dye based inks like the i9900, but they are archival compared to the i9900 inks. The Pro-10 uses pigment inks. I personally like dye based inks. Not only are the colors more vibrant with dye based inks, but there are less problems with nozzle clogging. I have a Pro-9500 printer that uses pigment based inks and I have had nothing but problems with it since day one. I also have an i9900 printer for several years,&amp;nbsp;and recently, a Pro-100. I love the print quality I get from the i9900 and it is pretty much a trouble free printer, as you probably already know. At first, I was disappointed with the Pro-100 printer because I could not get the prints from third party papers (ICC Profiles installed)&amp;nbsp;to match my color profiled monitor. I have done a bit of experimenting and since then, I have found a workable solution to get prints from the Pro-100 to match my monitor with third party papers. I now think it's a wonderful/awesome printer. It also seems to be very&amp;nbsp;economical with ink usage. If you decide to get the Pro-100, check out my post regarding color matching with the Pro-100. This solution will probably work with the Pro-10 printer as well as with my Pro-9500 printer. I haven't tried it on the Pro-9500 because its printhead is clogged and I haven't been able to get it unclogged. Hope this was helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>artjewel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-14T03:47:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pro-100 and Pro-10 prints noticeably better than i9900 prints?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Pro-100-and-Pro-10-prints-noticeably-better-than-i9900-prints/m-p/7733#M26</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I use a Canon i9900 which I've had since 2005. &amp;nbsp;I use the i9900 almost exclusively for color landscape printing. &amp;nbsp;The i9900 still makes fantastic prints and I've never had a problem with it. &amp;nbsp;I'm thinking of upgrading to either the PIXMA Pro-100 or Pro-10. &amp;nbsp;Will I notice an improvement over prints from the i9900 with either the Pro-100 or Pro-10? &amp;nbsp;Also, I've read that besides longevity, pigment inks now produce colors almost as vibrant as dye inks. &amp;nbsp;Anyone know if this is true?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Pro-100-and-Pro-10-prints-noticeably-better-than-i9900-prints/m-p/7733#M26</guid>
      <dc:creator>LandscapeLover</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-17T16:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro-100 and Pro-10 prints noticeably better than i9900 prints?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Pro-100-and-Pro-10-prints-noticeably-better-than-i9900-prints/m-p/29599#M211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pro-100 uses dye based inks like the i9900, but they are archival compared to the i9900 inks. The Pro-10 uses pigment inks. I personally like dye based inks. Not only are the colors more vibrant with dye based inks, but there are less problems with nozzle clogging. I have a Pro-9500 printer that uses pigment based inks and I have had nothing but problems with it since day one. I also have an i9900 printer for several years,&amp;nbsp;and recently, a Pro-100. I love the print quality I get from the i9900 and it is pretty much a trouble free printer, as you probably already know. At first, I was disappointed with the Pro-100 printer because I could not get the prints from third party papers (ICC Profiles installed)&amp;nbsp;to match my color profiled monitor. I have done a bit of experimenting and since then, I have found a workable solution to get prints from the Pro-100 to match my monitor with third party papers. I now think it's a wonderful/awesome printer. It also seems to be very&amp;nbsp;economical with ink usage. If you decide to get the Pro-100, check out my post regarding color matching with the Pro-100. This solution will probably work with the Pro-10 printer as well as with my Pro-9500 printer. I haven't tried it on the Pro-9500 because its printhead is clogged and I haven't been able to get it unclogged. Hope this was helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Pro-100-and-Pro-10-prints-noticeably-better-than-i9900-prints/m-p/29599#M211</guid>
      <dc:creator>artjewel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-14T03:47:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

