<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Advice/opinion on upgrading Pro 9000 II to Pro 10 or maybe Pro 1 in Professional Photo Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Advice-opinion-on-upgrading-Pro-9000-II-to-Pro-10-or-maybe-Pro-1/m-p/113933#M1256</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody - opinions welcomed please.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I currently run 2 x Pro 9000 Mk IIs and 1 x HP Designjet Z2100 44" (this runs exactly the same ink and printheads as the HP B9180 but a lot bigger).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do a lot of printing for design and art students from the local university. Their work usually consists of a mixture of flat pale colour/grey, vivid photos, bad photos, design graphics, text .. everything on one A3 page .. many hundreds of different pages in their busy times. Predominantly on smooth white matte photo paper.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mainly use the 9000s for these but have always struggled with the 'magenta warm' appearance of the prints, especially on pale grey backgrounds and yellows. &lt;SPAN&gt;I experimented with many papers and have heeded the huge amount of advice on the 9000 being too warm, but have decided that I need to change.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For pure greyscale, I always use the Z2100 which is beautifully neutral, but it struggles a bit when it comes to some colours not 'popping'. It is also very slow and laborious to load single sheets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading around the subject, the Pro 100 looks to have similar warm issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Epson 3000 is an option, but am running very scared of clogging and wasted ink on swapping matte and photo papers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, for mainly but not always matte photo paper, would I be better served by the Pro 10 or maybe Pro 1? Quality-wise, the Pro 10 would definitely suffice. My concerns being that 1) The prints may still be a bit warm 2) The pigment ink would be rather dull on matte paper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I so SO wish that HP had upgraded the B9180 with a better range of colours, similar to the Z3200!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gentlepeople of Canon - I do hope you are noting this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance .....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bobphill</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-09T14:26:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Advice/opinion on upgrading Pro 9000 II to Pro 10 or maybe Pro 1</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Advice-opinion-on-upgrading-Pro-9000-II-to-Pro-10-or-maybe-Pro-1/m-p/113933#M1256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody - opinions welcomed please.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I currently run 2 x Pro 9000 Mk IIs and 1 x HP Designjet Z2100 44" (this runs exactly the same ink and printheads as the HP B9180 but a lot bigger).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do a lot of printing for design and art students from the local university. Their work usually consists of a mixture of flat pale colour/grey, vivid photos, bad photos, design graphics, text .. everything on one A3 page .. many hundreds of different pages in their busy times. Predominantly on smooth white matte photo paper.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mainly use the 9000s for these but have always struggled with the 'magenta warm' appearance of the prints, especially on pale grey backgrounds and yellows. &lt;SPAN&gt;I experimented with many papers and have heeded the huge amount of advice on the 9000 being too warm, but have decided that I need to change.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For pure greyscale, I always use the Z2100 which is beautifully neutral, but it struggles a bit when it comes to some colours not 'popping'. It is also very slow and laborious to load single sheets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading around the subject, the Pro 100 looks to have similar warm issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Epson 3000 is an option, but am running very scared of clogging and wasted ink on swapping matte and photo papers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, for mainly but not always matte photo paper, would I be better served by the Pro 10 or maybe Pro 1? Quality-wise, the Pro 10 would definitely suffice. My concerns being that 1) The prints may still be a bit warm 2) The pigment ink would be rather dull on matte paper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I so SO wish that HP had upgraded the B9180 with a better range of colours, similar to the Z3200!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gentlepeople of Canon - I do hope you are noting this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance .....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Photo-Printers/Advice-opinion-on-upgrading-Pro-9000-II-to-Pro-10-or-maybe-Pro-1/m-p/113933#M1256</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobphill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-09T14:26:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

