<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon EF-EOS R 0.71x Testing in Professional Video</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/Canon-EF-EOS-R-0-71x-Testing/m-p/349216#M654</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As an owner of an EF 50mm f/1.2L, when I picked up my C70, I just knew I had to try out the 0.71x adapter. &amp;nbsp;So this past weekend, did just that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scene: basement setup in the evening with virtually no ambient light influencing the scene. &amp;nbsp;Single 60-watt equivalent LED 5000K bulb 16 feet away from the subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I first set up the C70 with the adapter and 50mm lens on a tripod to get the framing I wanted. &amp;nbsp; Having said that, after computing the crop factor of the Super 35 with the 0.71 from the adapter, you end up with a crop of 1.0366 or just under 52 mm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the correct exposure of this dim scene (I wanted the footage to match what I physically saw in person), it would be f/2.8, shutter of 1/48s and ISO 3200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First up, my Vixia HF G50. &amp;nbsp; Since the zoom range doesn't reveal the focal length, I had to guess and approximate the framing. &amp;nbsp;I was recording in UHD with the 8-bit 4:2:0 150 Mbps codec, 23.98 fps. &amp;nbsp; f/2.8, 1/48 shutter, and gain of 24dB (at the max). &amp;nbsp;No idea what ISO this is, but I do know it would be no greater than 1600. &amp;nbsp;I'd guess this was around 1250.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scaled down version here of a UHD frame, then a 100% view of a small section. &amp;nbsp;Along with being underexposed, massive chroma noise and artifacts in general.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29785i0DE69F024F0CD8FC/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Vixia_HF_G50_noise.jpg" title="Vixia_HF_G50_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29786i67104374CD43A93D/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="vixia_hf_g50_noise_detail.jpg" title="vixia_hf_g50_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next up, my C70 with RF f/2.8 L lens. &amp;nbsp;Set to 35mm to get the same framing (approx 52 mm equivalent). &amp;nbsp;When recording in DCI 4K, the crop factor is 1.46. &amp;nbsp; True 24 fps. &amp;nbsp;Used the All-I codec (10-bit 4:2:2 at 440 Mbps). Shutter at 1/48 and ISO at 3200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here you can clearly see the advantages at play here. &amp;nbsp;Mostly due to the massive sensor as compared to the Vixia's. &amp;nbsp;Each sensor site is 13.5 times the area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE: The following images will appear "flat". &amp;nbsp;I recorded with CLog2 on the C70. &amp;nbsp;No post-production applied at all to these movie stills.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29787i1B96CC2E0E82E240/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_RF_2_8_noise.jpg" title="C70_RF_2_8_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29788i603B15BAF905D4AD/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_RF_2_8_noise_detail.jpg" title="C70_RF_2_8_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, the C70 with 0.71 adapter and the EF 50mm f/1.2. &amp;nbsp;Specifically for light-gathering, this was now an f/0.9 lens! &amp;nbsp; Field of view was still the 52mm on full frame and depth of field was still based on the f/1.2 value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This allowed me to drop the ISO down to 320. &amp;nbsp; If I had a 1-stop ND filter, I would have also tried that so as to set the ISO closer to the 800 value. &amp;nbsp;Still, lower ISO leads to less noise and this was not a high-dynamic range scene at all. &amp;nbsp;So loosing some of the 16+ stops of latitude was not a problem at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29789iD46365529E83D082/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_EF_1_2_noise.jpg" title="C70_EF_1_2_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29790iC0ABD116FB021FC9/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_EF_1_2_noise_detail.jpg" title="C70_EF_1_2_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other notes... typically not a fan of in-body (digital) stabilization. &amp;nbsp;For all tests above, that was off since on a tripod. &amp;nbsp;But I did capture some footage hand-held and it did a really good job with the EF 50mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other really impressive thing was when going outside. &amp;nbsp; I captured footage in bright sunlight with the 10-stop internal ND enabled, but a 3-stop ND stacked with a CPL on the 50 mm lens. &amp;nbsp;So anywhere from 14 to 14.5 stops of ND (the CPL has a 1/2 variance depending upon it's rotation). &amp;nbsp; Focus could still be acquired which was impressive. &amp;nbsp; I did have to max the screen luminance and that was still a bit difficult to see. &amp;nbsp; But the footage turned out well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will definitely rent this adapter again when needing to capture footage in very dim conditions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-08-11T21:12:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon EF-EOS R 0.71x Testing</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/Canon-EF-EOS-R-0-71x-Testing/m-p/349216#M654</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As an owner of an EF 50mm f/1.2L, when I picked up my C70, I just knew I had to try out the 0.71x adapter. &amp;nbsp;So this past weekend, did just that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scene: basement setup in the evening with virtually no ambient light influencing the scene. &amp;nbsp;Single 60-watt equivalent LED 5000K bulb 16 feet away from the subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I first set up the C70 with the adapter and 50mm lens on a tripod to get the framing I wanted. &amp;nbsp; Having said that, after computing the crop factor of the Super 35 with the 0.71 from the adapter, you end up with a crop of 1.0366 or just under 52 mm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the correct exposure of this dim scene (I wanted the footage to match what I physically saw in person), it would be f/2.8, shutter of 1/48s and ISO 3200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First up, my Vixia HF G50. &amp;nbsp; Since the zoom range doesn't reveal the focal length, I had to guess and approximate the framing. &amp;nbsp;I was recording in UHD with the 8-bit 4:2:0 150 Mbps codec, 23.98 fps. &amp;nbsp; f/2.8, 1/48 shutter, and gain of 24dB (at the max). &amp;nbsp;No idea what ISO this is, but I do know it would be no greater than 1600. &amp;nbsp;I'd guess this was around 1250.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scaled down version here of a UHD frame, then a 100% view of a small section. &amp;nbsp;Along with being underexposed, massive chroma noise and artifacts in general.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29785i0DE69F024F0CD8FC/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Vixia_HF_G50_noise.jpg" title="Vixia_HF_G50_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29786i67104374CD43A93D/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="vixia_hf_g50_noise_detail.jpg" title="vixia_hf_g50_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next up, my C70 with RF f/2.8 L lens. &amp;nbsp;Set to 35mm to get the same framing (approx 52 mm equivalent). &amp;nbsp;When recording in DCI 4K, the crop factor is 1.46. &amp;nbsp; True 24 fps. &amp;nbsp;Used the All-I codec (10-bit 4:2:2 at 440 Mbps). Shutter at 1/48 and ISO at 3200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here you can clearly see the advantages at play here. &amp;nbsp;Mostly due to the massive sensor as compared to the Vixia's. &amp;nbsp;Each sensor site is 13.5 times the area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE: The following images will appear "flat". &amp;nbsp;I recorded with CLog2 on the C70. &amp;nbsp;No post-production applied at all to these movie stills.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29787i1B96CC2E0E82E240/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_RF_2_8_noise.jpg" title="C70_RF_2_8_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29788i603B15BAF905D4AD/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_RF_2_8_noise_detail.jpg" title="C70_RF_2_8_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, the C70 with 0.71 adapter and the EF 50mm f/1.2. &amp;nbsp;Specifically for light-gathering, this was now an f/0.9 lens! &amp;nbsp; Field of view was still the 52mm on full frame and depth of field was still based on the f/1.2 value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This allowed me to drop the ISO down to 320. &amp;nbsp; If I had a 1-stop ND filter, I would have also tried that so as to set the ISO closer to the 800 value. &amp;nbsp;Still, lower ISO leads to less noise and this was not a high-dynamic range scene at all. &amp;nbsp;So loosing some of the 16+ stops of latitude was not a problem at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29789iD46365529E83D082/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_EF_1_2_noise.jpg" title="C70_EF_1_2_noise.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29790iC0ABD116FB021FC9/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="C70_EF_1_2_noise_detail.jpg" title="C70_EF_1_2_noise_detail.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other notes... typically not a fan of in-body (digital) stabilization. &amp;nbsp;For all tests above, that was off since on a tripod. &amp;nbsp;But I did capture some footage hand-held and it did a really good job with the EF 50mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other really impressive thing was when going outside. &amp;nbsp; I captured footage in bright sunlight with the 10-stop internal ND enabled, but a 3-stop ND stacked with a CPL on the 50 mm lens. &amp;nbsp;So anywhere from 14 to 14.5 stops of ND (the CPL has a 1/2 variance depending upon it's rotation). &amp;nbsp; Focus could still be acquired which was impressive. &amp;nbsp; I did have to max the screen luminance and that was still a bit difficult to see. &amp;nbsp; But the footage turned out well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will definitely rent this adapter again when needing to capture footage in very dim conditions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/Canon-EF-EOS-R-0-71x-Testing/m-p/349216#M654</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-11T21:12:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

