<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT in Professional Video</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/582505#M5587</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've been using this &lt;SPAN&gt;Canon 709&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;LUT now since it came out, over Canon's original LUTS, on my Canon C700 Full Frame. Even more WYSIWYG, once you have your exposures dial in. Just right amount of contrast and great blacks from either CLOG2 or CLOG3,&amp;nbsp;Cinema Gamut, files.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharlesTeton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-13T16:19:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563580#M5343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Previously unavailable, as far as I can tell, Canon 3D LUT for Canon 709 for both C-Log 2 and 3 is now finally available at&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://hk.canon/en/support/0200747702" target="_blank"&gt;https://hk.canon/en/support/0200747702&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am personally very excited as this LUT gives a fairly punchy, colorful look that I couldn't get, without sacrificing my log footage (my R5II can shot in Canon 709, but then it doesn't save "unadulterated" log footage), or tweaking my footage in post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Very cool, thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 19:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563580#M5343</guid>
      <dc:creator>fullest_rasps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-09T19:10:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563669#M5345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Trying to figure out what's new here... Canon have had Log2 and Log3 to BT709 LUTs in their standard LUT pack for years, but those were to BT709 Wide DR.&amp;nbsp; Looks like the new LUTs are to plain BT709.&amp;nbsp; Not sure what the difference really is, but they are different.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BTW by "standard LUT pack" I mean "&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Canon lookup table Version 201911", which you can get from their support site.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 07:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563669#M5345</guid>
      <dc:creator>AtticusLake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-10T07:15:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563715#M5349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"Canon Wide DR" and "Canon 709" are similar but slightly different looks. "Canon 709" is very slightly more contrasty – has whiter whites and blacker blacks, if you will, while the mids/majority of the image is very similar, if not identical, to Wide DR.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, AFAIU and I'm a layman, these are not strictly "specification Rec. 709" in terms of transfer function/gamma. Rec. 709, which is available on the Canon R5 II has much, much less dynamic range, but I presume it's included if someone needs it, possibly for broadcast purposes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 20:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/563715#M5349</guid>
      <dc:creator>fullest_rasps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-10T20:18:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/574345#M5486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a technical White Paper on this&amp;nbsp;Canon 709 &amp;amp; CMT 709 LUTS:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.usa.canon.com/content/dam/canon-assets/white-papers/pro/Canon-709-CMT-709-WP.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.usa.canon.com/content/dam/canon-assets/white-papers/pro/Canon-709-CMT-709-WP.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my tests this latest Canon 709 LUT look more accurate to what I'm testing on, contrast wise but it's also making charges to the mid and shadow areas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.56.44.png" style="width: 641px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71307iF8D20CDD31B2A933/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.56.44.png" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.56.44.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.57.09.png" style="width: 667px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71308i0591D84A2761D024/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.57.09.png" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-08 at 22.57.09.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting stuff.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Charles&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 23:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/574345#M5486</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlesTeton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-08T23:01:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ICYMI: Canon dropped the C-Log 2/3 to Canon 709 LUT</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/582505#M5587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've been using this &lt;SPAN&gt;Canon 709&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;LUT now since it came out, over Canon's original LUTS, on my Canon C700 Full Frame. Even more WYSIWYG, once you have your exposures dial in. Just right amount of contrast and great blacks from either CLOG2 or CLOG3,&amp;nbsp;Cinema Gamut, files.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/ICYMI-Canon-dropped-the-C-Log-2-3-to-Canon-709-LUT/m-p/582505#M5587</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlesTeton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-13T16:19:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

