<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic XF605-New &amp;quot;Phone Home&amp;quot; Feature in Professional Video</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-New-quot-Phone-Home-quot-Feature/m-p/563860#M5351</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So, I was just about to see if the latest firmware update would finally banish the networking gremlins that have plagued my XF605 since the day I got it-until my eyes fell upon a couple of new features, the second of which brought me to a dead stop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I'm not really enamored of having to create and remember a password, I can see how some users (or their employers/clients) will appreciate having the option of enhancing the protection of the camera and those potentially precious clips by doing so.&amp;nbsp; I just think it ought to be an option rather than a requirement-you know, a "Would you like to...?" rather then a "Thou shalt..."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, however, we come to the new feature which checks for updated firmware whenever the camera is online.&amp;nbsp; Hmmm...where's the option to turn that off if you happen to be working someplace where you don't want the camera sniffing around for that-or anything else other than what you need to support whatever job you're on at the moment?&amp;nbsp; Did I miss that or was it left out of the latest version of the user manual?&amp;nbsp; Didn't see anything like that anywhere.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't know about you, but I can certainly think of some places around the world-and increasingly here at home, unfortunately-where having a third party being able to obtain knowledge about where someone using something like a professional video camera is and what they're doing with it there could pose a risk to them, whether intended or not.&amp;nbsp; Has Canon thought about how they'll respond to a subpoena demanding such information?&amp;nbsp; And what if the demand comes from authorities in a country with a constitution and laws nothing like ours?&amp;nbsp; Would the response depend on how badly Canon still wanted to do business there?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope I'm just being paranoid.&amp;nbsp; Frankly, I haven't been in any such situation as the above and don't plan on it.&amp;nbsp; But you never know.&amp;nbsp; I really don't want to go to 1.0.6.1 unless the phone-home feature&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CAN&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;be turned off-and i mean&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;TURNED OFF,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;just ignored.&amp;nbsp; If not, I'll wait until 1.0.7.1-or whenever.&amp;nbsp; Sooner or later someone will see the light.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 23:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-11T23:51:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XF605-New "Phone Home" Feature</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-New-quot-Phone-Home-quot-Feature/m-p/563860#M5351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, I was just about to see if the latest firmware update would finally banish the networking gremlins that have plagued my XF605 since the day I got it-until my eyes fell upon a couple of new features, the second of which brought me to a dead stop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I'm not really enamored of having to create and remember a password, I can see how some users (or their employers/clients) will appreciate having the option of enhancing the protection of the camera and those potentially precious clips by doing so.&amp;nbsp; I just think it ought to be an option rather than a requirement-you know, a "Would you like to...?" rather then a "Thou shalt..."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, however, we come to the new feature which checks for updated firmware whenever the camera is online.&amp;nbsp; Hmmm...where's the option to turn that off if you happen to be working someplace where you don't want the camera sniffing around for that-or anything else other than what you need to support whatever job you're on at the moment?&amp;nbsp; Did I miss that or was it left out of the latest version of the user manual?&amp;nbsp; Didn't see anything like that anywhere.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't know about you, but I can certainly think of some places around the world-and increasingly here at home, unfortunately-where having a third party being able to obtain knowledge about where someone using something like a professional video camera is and what they're doing with it there could pose a risk to them, whether intended or not.&amp;nbsp; Has Canon thought about how they'll respond to a subpoena demanding such information?&amp;nbsp; And what if the demand comes from authorities in a country with a constitution and laws nothing like ours?&amp;nbsp; Would the response depend on how badly Canon still wanted to do business there?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope I'm just being paranoid.&amp;nbsp; Frankly, I haven't been in any such situation as the above and don't plan on it.&amp;nbsp; But you never know.&amp;nbsp; I really don't want to go to 1.0.6.1 unless the phone-home feature&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CAN&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;be turned off-and i mean&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;TURNED OFF,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;just ignored.&amp;nbsp; If not, I'll wait until 1.0.7.1-or whenever.&amp;nbsp; Sooner or later someone will see the light.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 23:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-New-quot-Phone-Home-quot-Feature/m-p/563860#M5351</guid>
      <dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-11T23:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

