<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EOS C400 Lens length and weight considerations in Professional Video</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/513421#M4691</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Being proactive at the moment. I've got a EF 24-70 f/2.8 L on the EF-RF adaptor currently and that seems fine. But I have concerns about the EF 70-200 f2.8L on an adaptor for instance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>albion</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-18T22:08:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EOS C400 Lens length and weight considerations</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/512876#M4688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've always been uncertain about what weight/size lens needs support on Canon Cinema cameras. I know it can vary based on being static on a tripod versus run and gun. Specifically, can I use a Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 on my C400 without lens support on a tripod or in run and gun scenarios? Any other more general rules of thumb?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:38:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/512876#M4688</guid>
      <dc:creator>albion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T18:38:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS C400 Lens length and weight considerations</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/513305#M4690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You’re likely safe without lens support for most scenarios, especially if you’re sticking to a solid tripod or handheld rig. But the adapter situation is where it can get tricky—those extra stress points can make support &lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7" color="#FFFFFF"&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.prosperidad-social.com.co" target="_self"&gt;CLIC AQUÍ&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;a smart choice for heavier builds. Have you noticed any flex or strain in your setup yet, or are you just being proactive?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/513305#M4690</guid>
      <dc:creator>judith75hodges</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-19T04:43:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS C400 Lens length and weight considerations</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/513421#M4691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Being proactive at the moment. I've got a EF 24-70 f/2.8 L on the EF-RF adaptor currently and that seems fine. But I have concerns about the EF 70-200 f2.8L on an adaptor for instance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/EOS-C400-Lens-length-and-weight-considerations/m-p/513421#M4691</guid>
      <dc:creator>albion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-18T22:08:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

