<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally in Professional Video</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410930#M2821</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The manual is confusing in that it's not showing any framerates for 4K output. &amp;nbsp; For HD at 1080p, I only see framerates maxing out at 59.94i (so that seems to thus max out at 29.97P). &amp;nbsp; A lower resolution of 720p could then output 59.94P.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said all that, you wouldn't be able to output 120 fps over HDMI at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of recording that footage internally and then sending out to an external recorder, why not just import the original footage and transcode as needed in your non-linear editor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-21T22:27:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410492#M2801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi. I'm using a Canon XF605 recording to a Ninja Inferno in pro-res.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'd like to shoot 60 fps in 4K to enable smooth slo-mo. That is only possible if I select long GOP vs intra-frame. Connecting a recorder does not change this.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For editing and quality-wise, is it moot when recording pro-res? I am confused since Canon's HDMI output isn't raw or normally compressed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410492#M2801</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickMDal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T13:04:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410908#M2818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On DVInfo, someone just pointed out that long GOP and intra-frame only relate to internal recording (which makes sense).&amp;nbsp; So it seems to be moot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does the HDMI output send?&amp;nbsp; It is a mystery.&amp;nbsp; I would guess individual uncompressed frames, which is not raw.&amp;nbsp; I wonder what it is!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So... One can shoot full quality 1080P at 120fps to an external monitor.&amp;nbsp; That is good news!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Side note...&amp;nbsp; Only the R3 can shoot at a higher framerate - 240fps.&amp;nbsp; Too bad it has so many other expensive features!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410908#M2818</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickMDal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T21:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410911#M2819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The manual should at least outline the bit-depth and chroma-subsampling that would be sent out the HDMI port (e.g. 8-bit 4:2:2 or 10-bit 4:2:2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In terms of what type of signal it would be, it should be uncompressed. &amp;nbsp; The HDMI spec should have the details.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410911#M2819</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T21:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410917#M2820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well it's not so straightforward.&amp;nbsp; XF605 does not send slow motion to a recorder.&amp;nbsp; The "shooting" framerate is not recognized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, the only workaroud is to record to the SD card 1080P 422 10 bit Long GOP.&amp;nbsp; They play it back to the recorder, which will record the 30/120 footage 1/4 of 120fps.&amp;nbsp; The Long GOP artifact is present.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The camera cannot shoot at a native 120fps framerate.&amp;nbsp; So no way to record normally and then reset it to 30 in post.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410917#M2820</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickMDal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T21:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410930#M2821</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The manual is confusing in that it's not showing any framerates for 4K output. &amp;nbsp; For HD at 1080p, I only see framerates maxing out at 59.94i (so that seems to thus max out at 29.97P). &amp;nbsp; A lower resolution of 720p could then output 59.94P.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said all that, you wouldn't be able to output 120 fps over HDMI at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of recording that footage internally and then sending out to an external recorder, why not just import the original footage and transcode as needed in your non-linear editor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410930#M2821</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T22:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410934#M2822</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't understand the transcode recommendation.&amp;nbsp; Are you saying to take the recorder out of the loop?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I lose the editing codec pro-res.&amp;nbsp; We shoot with 3 timecoded cameras so editing compressed video directly would bog down the editing process.&amp;nbsp; I would also lose the 7" bright display.&amp;nbsp; All shooting is outdoors.&amp;nbsp; Fast moving insects in bright sun.&amp;nbsp; The LCD would be difficult to rely on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if Davinci Resolve would recognize the defined shooting rate vs the playback framerate.&amp;nbsp; I know how to reset the playback framerate in DR.&amp;nbsp; Also not sure how to transcode to an intermediate codec.&amp;nbsp; I can only use the pro-res codec by recorder since I am in windows.&amp;nbsp; I don't have a license for Avid's DNx codecs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410934#M2822</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickMDal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T22:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410937#M2823</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm confused. &amp;nbsp;If you need to record high frame rate footage, then as you found, you'd need to record to internal media. &amp;nbsp; You had then stated that you were playing back that footage and using the recorder to record. &amp;nbsp; Presumably you then take ProRes footage from the recorder and injest that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was recommending bypassing that middle step. &amp;nbsp;e.g. with Final Cut Pro, you can always create "optimized media" which would be ProRes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:53:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410937#M2823</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T23:53:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410955#M2824</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Okay I just experimented in DR and found it &lt;STRONG&gt;does&lt;/STRONG&gt; transcode to DNxHR HQX.&amp;nbsp; Sorry for my confusion since in the proxy media format, prores is not listed.&amp;nbsp; Since I can't use DNx in the recorder without paying extra for the license, I assumed DR would not transcode to that format.&amp;nbsp; Happily I'm wrong!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I assumed I was limited to the prores output of the recorder.&amp;nbsp; Not so!&amp;nbsp; Thanks for guiding me here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So for recording 120fps, the monitor is just a monitor.&amp;nbsp; Since the camera output is 1080p, the transcode is about as time consuming as my play/record method and so vastly better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By your approach, I end up with LOG 1080p, 120fps, 10 bit 422 footage converted to DNx. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One last question if you don't mind.&amp;nbsp; MP4 does not list a compression method (like long-GOP or intra-frame), but it has the same bitrate as XF-AVC.&amp;nbsp; Which of the two XF compression methods is it more like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 04:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410955#M2824</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickMDal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-22T04:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XF605 Intra-frame vs Long GOP recording externally</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410980#M2825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice! Glad you're able to maximize the quality of the 120 fps footage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In terms of what MP4 compression would be closest to, my guess would be XF-AVC Long GOP. &amp;nbsp; It gets tricky when comparing just bitrates since newer codecs often have higher quality at the same bitrate as older codecs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 13:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Professional-Video/XF605-Intra-frame-vs-Long-GOP-recording-externally/m-p/410980#M2825</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-22T13:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

