<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Concert PIX : SX 500 IS vs SX 510 HS : Better to have lower / higher megapixels?  Thank you! :) in Point &amp; Shoot Digital Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/45981#M4081</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;A clean high ISO will be more important then pixel count &amp;amp; more imortantly as pixel count goes up so does edge smear from motion or camera shake. IF everything else was equal a camera with 50% more pixels would have a softer image of the exact same shot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-26T03:06:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Concert PIX : SX 500 IS vs SX 510 HS : Better to have lower / higher megapixels?  Thank you! :)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/45967#M4080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am thinking of getting a new point and shoot.&amp;nbsp; I have a SEVEN YEAR old cybershot Sony.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; No flash photography ... and I so wanted to capture this shot ... which I did a blurry mess! &lt;img id="womansad" class="emoticon emoticon-womansad" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_woman-sad.png" alt="Woman Sad" title="Woman Sad" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; I have a CANON EOS REBEL ... but when attending concerts ... I need a point &amp;amp; shoot.&amp;nbsp; I want the best for my money ... roughly $300.00 or less ... if possible! &lt;img id="womanhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-womanhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_woman-happy.png" alt="Woman Happy" title="Woman Happy" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG align="middle" title="DSC05980 copyTSknees.jpg" alt="DSC05980 copyTSknees.jpg" border="0" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2589iE265597EE7573D9D/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" /&gt;I am debating about the SX series of Canon cameras.&amp;nbsp; I am not sure of two things ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IS vs HS ... What is the difference between Image Stablization and High Speed for Concert low light photography?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12.1 vs 16.0 ... Is it best to have a LOWER or HIGHER Megapixels for concert photography?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am self taught.&amp;nbsp; I have the 'eye' for capturing a great image ... I just am not sure of the technical aspects of a camera!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you soooooooooo much for this forum!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Miss Ruby&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peace &amp;amp; Love! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":red_heart:"&gt;❤️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/45967#M4080</guid>
      <dc:creator>MissRubySFO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-26T00:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concert PIX : SX 500 IS vs SX 510 HS : Better to have lower / higher megapixels?  Thank you! :)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/45981#M4081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A clean high ISO will be more important then pixel count &amp;amp; more imortantly as pixel count goes up so does edge smear from motion or camera shake. IF everything else was equal a camera with 50% more pixels would have a softer image of the exact same shot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 03:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/45981#M4081</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-26T03:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concert PIX : SX 500 IS vs SX 510 HS : Better to have lower / higher megapixels?  Thank you! :)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/46013#M4082</link>
      <description>Thank you for your comment cicopo. I am not sure if. I should even consider either of these cameras, let alone a Canon, based upon your statement of ISO. I am passionate alright! I created a poster from 2 of my photos (taken with my, then 4 year old SONY Cybershot) at a Roger Waters' performance, 03DEC10 &amp;amp; I was lucky enough to have him autograph it 5 days later, at his next show! It now hangs on my living room wall! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; I still have my 1st camera, a Kodak 134 Instamatiic, from the 4th grade. I was roughly 8 years old then. I will be 55 on November 5th. Even with 47 years of practice, I am not above learning what I am passionate about. PEACE &amp;amp; LOVE!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:57:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Point-Shoot-Digital-Cameras/Concert-PIX-SX-500-IS-vs-SX-510-HS-Better-to-have-lower-higher/m-p/46013#M4082</guid>
      <dc:creator>MissRubySFO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-26T09:57:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

