<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Improve scan quality with flat bed feeder on MF8580Cdw in Office Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Office-Printers/Improve-scan-quality-with-flat-bed-feeder-on-MF8580Cdw/m-p/169752#M4213</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone give me a suggestion on how to improve the scan quality of my new MF8580? The opriginals are appropriate in darkne4ss however the scan comes out extremely light and unreadable. If I can not resolve thios I will be forced to return it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcanddulsie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-09T12:35:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improve scan quality with flat bed feeder on MF8580Cdw</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Office-Printers/Improve-scan-quality-with-flat-bed-feeder-on-MF8580Cdw/m-p/169752#M4213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can someone give me a suggestion on how to improve the scan quality of my new MF8580? The opriginals are appropriate in darkne4ss however the scan comes out extremely light and unreadable. If I can not resolve thios I will be forced to return it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Office-Printers/Improve-scan-quality-with-flat-bed-feeder-on-MF8580Cdw/m-p/169752#M4213</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcanddulsie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-09T12:35:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

