<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon Return Policy Complaint in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-Return-Policy-Complaint/m-p/593788#M41578</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently needed to replace my 3 year old ImageClass MF445dw all-in-one due to artifacts apparently caused by contamination on the scanning window that I could not fix.&amp;nbsp; I placed my order directly with Canon by phone. I explained the situation and stated that I wanted a machine with the exact capabilities of the 445, except that faxing was not required.&amp;nbsp; The representative recommended the ImageCLASS MF284dw.&amp;nbsp; I placed the order and received the machine shortly thereafter.&amp;nbsp; After about a week of use, I began to suspect that the MF284dw lacked two-sided scanning, which was a feature of importance to me on my old machine.&amp;nbsp; I had not had an actual need to use the feature yet, but even though I removed the 445 software, somehow the old scan utility stuck around, and it showed double-sided capability, adding to my confusion.&amp;nbsp; And while this was important, I did not find time to call Canon and address the issue until about 24 days following the purchase date.&amp;nbsp; I was told that Canon's return/exchange policy was firm at 14 days.&amp;nbsp; However, I was offered the ability to return the machine provided I paid the shipping.&amp;nbsp; I knew from experience that the offer was likely not economically viable, and confirmed on the UPS website that return freight would cost $195, almost the full price of the machine.&amp;nbsp; I asked if there was any way I could be extended the Canon corporate shipping rate, but that was declined.&amp;nbsp; In my opinion, the return offer was disingenuous. Canon had to know that my freight cost would make it unacceptable.&amp;nbsp; I remain displeased that I chose to rely on the advice of a Canon sales associate to my peril.&amp;nbsp; Canon has heretofore been an exellent company to deal with, and their products and post-purchase support made them my first choice.&amp;nbsp; My confidence in them is sadly no longer intact.&amp;nbsp; As it turns out, there is another machine, the MF328dw, that has the features I needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>damjamb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-24T16:57:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon Return Policy Complaint</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-Return-Policy-Complaint/m-p/593788#M41578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently needed to replace my 3 year old ImageClass MF445dw all-in-one due to artifacts apparently caused by contamination on the scanning window that I could not fix.&amp;nbsp; I placed my order directly with Canon by phone. I explained the situation and stated that I wanted a machine with the exact capabilities of the 445, except that faxing was not required.&amp;nbsp; The representative recommended the ImageCLASS MF284dw.&amp;nbsp; I placed the order and received the machine shortly thereafter.&amp;nbsp; After about a week of use, I began to suspect that the MF284dw lacked two-sided scanning, which was a feature of importance to me on my old machine.&amp;nbsp; I had not had an actual need to use the feature yet, but even though I removed the 445 software, somehow the old scan utility stuck around, and it showed double-sided capability, adding to my confusion.&amp;nbsp; And while this was important, I did not find time to call Canon and address the issue until about 24 days following the purchase date.&amp;nbsp; I was told that Canon's return/exchange policy was firm at 14 days.&amp;nbsp; However, I was offered the ability to return the machine provided I paid the shipping.&amp;nbsp; I knew from experience that the offer was likely not economically viable, and confirmed on the UPS website that return freight would cost $195, almost the full price of the machine.&amp;nbsp; I asked if there was any way I could be extended the Canon corporate shipping rate, but that was declined.&amp;nbsp; In my opinion, the return offer was disingenuous. Canon had to know that my freight cost would make it unacceptable.&amp;nbsp; I remain displeased that I chose to rely on the advice of a Canon sales associate to my peril.&amp;nbsp; Canon has heretofore been an exellent company to deal with, and their products and post-purchase support made them my first choice.&amp;nbsp; My confidence in them is sadly no longer intact.&amp;nbsp; As it turns out, there is another machine, the MF328dw, that has the features I needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-Return-Policy-Complaint/m-p/593788#M41578</guid>
      <dc:creator>damjamb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-24T16:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

