<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The count on &amp;quot;Top Kudoed Authors&amp;quot; seems wildly inaccurate; how does that work? in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/The-count-on-quot-Top-Kudoed-Authors-quot-seems-wildly/m-p/13173#M328</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not a biggie, but I see on the main page, and on each sub-page, a block called "top kudoed authors".&amp;nbsp; The counts and top authors vary between pages, but it is always (seemingly) wrong.&amp;nbsp; Some "top authors" have only 1 Kudos.&amp;nbsp; Top "kudo" heavyweights appear like Cicopo, but with only a tiny fraction of their actual scores.&amp;nbsp; What does this mean/ how does this work?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-02T00:42:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The count on "Top Kudoed Authors" seems wildly inaccurate; how does that work?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/The-count-on-quot-Top-Kudoed-Authors-quot-seems-wildly/m-p/13173#M328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not a biggie, but I see on the main page, and on each sub-page, a block called "top kudoed authors".&amp;nbsp; The counts and top authors vary between pages, but it is always (seemingly) wrong.&amp;nbsp; Some "top authors" have only 1 Kudos.&amp;nbsp; Top "kudo" heavyweights appear like Cicopo, but with only a tiny fraction of their actual scores.&amp;nbsp; What does this mean/ how does this work?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/The-count-on-quot-Top-Kudoed-Authors-quot-seems-wildly/m-p/13173#M328</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-02T00:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The count on "Top Kudoed Authors" seems wildly inaccurate; how does that work?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/The-count-on-quot-Top-Kudoed-Authors-quot-seems-wildly/m-p/13177#M330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ScottyP, thanks for posting!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We're sorry for the confusion; we think you might be seeing the "Week" view for kudos.&amp;nbsp; If you click on the "View All" option right below the leaderboard, you can sort viewable options by several different parameters, including "All Time".&amp;nbsp; This All Time view should give you a more accurate tally of a user's overall kudos.&amp;nbsp; We hope this helps!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jessica in Support&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 02:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/The-count-on-quot-Top-Kudoed-Authors-quot-seems-wildly/m-p/13177#M330</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-02T02:31:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

