<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does anyone have experience with the CanoScan 9000F Mark II? in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Does-anyone-have-experience-with-the-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II/m-p/120895#M25983</link>
    <description>I'm think about scanning medium format slides and having some of the files printed commercially at up to 2' X 3'. I'm wondering about the quality even at the highest resolution of an under $200 scanner.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>slitzan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-20T21:04:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does anyone have experience with the CanoScan 9000F Mark II?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Does-anyone-have-experience-with-the-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II/m-p/120895#M25983</link>
      <description>I'm think about scanning medium format slides and having some of the files printed commercially at up to 2' X 3'. I'm wondering about the quality even at the highest resolution of an under $200 scanner.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Does-anyone-have-experience-with-the-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II/m-p/120895#M25983</guid>
      <dc:creator>slitzan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-20T21:04:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does anyone have experience with the CanoScan 9000F Mark II?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Does-anyone-have-experience-with-the-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II/m-p/215850#M25984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Aweful -- just aweful. The software acompanying the CanoScan 8000F Mark II is nearly unusable. The quality of scans is not relevant if you cant effectivly initiat a scan and save it in the location and format you prefere. I highly recommomend avoiding this device. The Epson Perfection v600 has a much better software interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 22:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Does-anyone-have-experience-with-the-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II/m-p/215850#M25984</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowlord7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-03T22:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

