<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon K940 Copier in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-K940-Copier/m-p/284156#M25541</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Old K940 analog copier has been a workhorse. Just replaced the cartridge with Canon original.. No other adjustments. Exposure is way off. On lightest auto setting white backgrounds still are gray. At usual mid exposure auto setting, backgrounds are very dark. Manual adjustments are no better. Is there a senor that can be replaced? Hate to throw it away.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Selrach927</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-17T16:50:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon K940 Copier</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-K940-Copier/m-p/284156#M25541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Old K940 analog copier has been a workhorse. Just replaced the cartridge with Canon original.. No other adjustments. Exposure is way off. On lightest auto setting white backgrounds still are gray. At usual mid exposure auto setting, backgrounds are very dark. Manual adjustments are no better. Is there a senor that can be replaced? Hate to throw it away.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Canon-K940-Copier/m-p/284156#M25541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Selrach927</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-17T16:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

